Skip to content

L
linux-davinci
Switch branch/tag
  1. 26 Apr, 2009 2 commits
  3. 01 May, 2009 1 commit
    • Theodore Ts'o's avatar
      ext4: ext4_mark_recovery_complete() doesn't need to use lock_super · a63c9eb2
      Theodore Ts'o authored 
      The function ext4_mark_recovery_complete() is called from two call
paths: either (a) while mounting the filesystem, in which case there's
no danger of any other CPU calling write_super() until the mount is
completed, and (b) while remounting the filesystem read-write, in
which case the fs core has already locked the superblock.  This also
allows us to take out a very vile unlock_super()/lock_super() pair in
ext4_remount().
Signed-off-by: default avatar"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      a63c9eb2
  5. 25 Apr, 2009 1 commit
  7. 01 May, 2009 4 commits
    • Theodore Ts'o's avatar
      ext4: Avoid races caused by on-line resizing and SMP memory reordering · 8df9675f
      Theodore Ts'o authored 
      Ext4's on-line resizing adds a new block group and then, only at the
last step adjusts s_groups_count.  However, it's possible on SMP
systems that another CPU could see the updated the s_group_count and
not see the newly initialized data structures for the just-added block
group.  For this reason, it's important to insert a SMP read barrier
after reading s_groups_count and before reading any (for example) the
new block group descriptors allowed by the increased value of
s_groups_count.

Unfortunately, we rather blatently violate this locking protocol
documented in fs/ext4/resize.c.  Fortunately, (1) on-line resizes
happen relatively rarely, and (2) it seems rare that the filesystem
code will immediately try to use just-added block group before any
memory ordering issues resolve themselves.  So apparently problems
here are relatively hard to hit, since ext3 has been vulnerable to the
same issue for years with no one apparently complaining.
Signed-off-by: default avatar"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      8df9675f
    • Theodore Ts'o's avatar
      ext4: Use separate super_operations structure for no_journal filesystems · 9ca92389
      Theodore Ts'o authored 
      By using a separate super_operations structure for filesystems that
have and don't have journals, we can simply ext4_write_super() ---
which is only needed when no journal is present --- and ext4_freeze(),
ext4_unfreeze(), and ext4_sync_fs(), which are only needed when the
journal is present.
Signed-off-by: default avatar"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      9ca92389
    • Theodore Ts'o's avatar
      ext4: Fix and simplify s_dirt handling · 7234ab2a
      Theodore Ts'o authored 
      The s_dirt flag wasn't completely handled correctly, but it didn't
really matter when journalling was enabled.  It turns out that when
ext4 runs without a journal, we don't clear s_dirt in places where we
should have, with the result that the high-level write_super()
function was writing the superblock when it wasn't necessary.

So we fix this by making ext4_commit_super() clear the s_dirt flag,
and removing many of the other places where s_dirt is manipulated.
When journalling is enabled, the s_dirt flag might be left set more
often, but s_dirt really doesn't matter when journalling is enabled.
Signed-off-by: default avatar"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      7234ab2a
    • Theodore Ts'o's avatar
      ext4: Simplify ext4_commit_super()'s function signature · e2d67052
      Theodore Ts'o authored 
      The ext4_commit_super() function took both a struct super_block * and
a struct ext4_super_block *, but the struct ext4_super_block can be
derived from the struct super_block.
Signed-off-by: default avatar"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      e2d67052
  9. 25 Apr, 2009 1 commit
  11. 28 Apr, 2009 1 commit
    • Theodore Ts'o's avatar
      ext4: Fallback to vmalloc if kmalloc can't allocate s_flex_groups array · c5ca7c76
      Theodore Ts'o authored 
      For very large filesystems, the s_flex_groups array can get quite big.
For example, a filesystem that can be resized up to 16TB will have
8192 flex groups (assuming the default flex_bg size of 16), so the
array is 96k, which is *very* marginal for kmalloc().  On the other
hand, a 160GB filesystem without the resize_inode feature will only
require 960 bytes.  So we try to allocate the array first using
kmalloc(), and if that fails, we'll try to use vmalloc() instead.
Signed-off-by: default avatar"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      c5ca7c76
  13. 12 May, 2009 2 commits
    • Aneesh Kumar K.V's avatar
      ext4: Mark the unwritten buffer_head as mapped during write_begin · 29fa89d0
      Aneesh Kumar K.V authored 
      Setting BH_Unwritten buffer_heads as BH_Mapped avoids multiple
(unnecessary) calls to get_block() during the call to the write(2)
system call.  Setting BH_Unwritten buffer heads as BH_Mapped requires
that the writepages() functions can handle BH_Unwritten buffer_heads.

After this commit, things work as follows:

ext4_ext_get_block() returns unmapped, unwritten, buffer head when
called with create = 0 for prealloc space. This makes sure we handle
the read path and non-delayed allocation case correctly.  Even though
the buffer head is marked unmapped we have valid b_blocknr and b_bdev
values in the buffer_head.

ext4_da_get_block_prep() called for block resrevation will now return
mapped, unwritten, new buffer_head for prealloc space. This avoids
multiple calls to get_block() for write to same offset. By making such
buffers as BH_New, we also assure that sub-block zeroing of buffered
writes happens correctly.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatar"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      29fa89d0
    • Aneesh Kumar K.V's avatar
      vfs: Add BUG_ON for delayed and unwritten flags in submit_bh() · 8fb0e342
      Aneesh Kumar K.V authored 
      The BH_Delay and BH_Unwritten flags should never leak out to
submit_bh().  So add some BUG_ON() checks to submit_bh so we can get a
stack trace and determine how and why this might have happened.

(Note that only XFS and ext4 use these buffer head flags, and XFS does
not use submit_bh().  So this patch should only modify behavior for
ext4.)
Signed-off-by: default avatarAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatar"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
      8fb0e342
  15. 13 May, 2009 1 commit
  17. 03 Jun, 2009 2 commits
  19. 02 Jun, 2009 11 commits
  21. 01 Jun, 2009 12 commits
  23. 31 May, 2009 1 commit
  25. 30 May, 2009 1 commit