Commit a63c9eb2 authored by Theodore Ts'o's avatar Theodore Ts'o

ext4: ext4_mark_recovery_complete() doesn't need to use lock_super

The function ext4_mark_recovery_complete() is called from two call
paths: either (a) while mounting the filesystem, in which case there's
no danger of any other CPU calling write_super() until the mount is
completed, and (b) while remounting the filesystem read-write, in
which case the fs core has already locked the superblock.  This also
allows us to take out a very vile unlock_super()/lock_super() pair in
ext4_remount().
Signed-off-by: default avatar"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
parent 114e9fc9
......@@ -3219,13 +3219,11 @@ static void ext4_mark_recovery_complete(struct super_block *sb,
if (jbd2_journal_flush(journal) < 0)
goto out;
lock_super(sb);
if (EXT4_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb, EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RECOVER) &&
sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY) {
EXT4_CLEAR_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb, EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RECOVER);
ext4_commit_super(sb, 1);
}
unlock_super(sb);
out:
jbd2_journal_unlock_updates(journal);
......@@ -3436,15 +3434,8 @@ static int ext4_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
(sbi->s_mount_state & EXT4_VALID_FS))
es->s_state = cpu_to_le16(sbi->s_mount_state);
/*
* We have to unlock super so that we can wait for
* transactions.
*/
if (sbi->s_journal) {
unlock_super(sb);
if (sbi->s_journal)
ext4_mark_recovery_complete(sb, es);
lock_super(sb);
}
} else {
int ret;
if ((ret = EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment