Commit bfd2e29f authored by Russell King's avatar Russell King

[ARM] Fix test for unimplemented ARM syscalls

The existing test always failed since 'no' was always greater than
0x7ff.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
parent 54189831
...@@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ asmlinkage int arm_syscall(int no, struct pt_regs *regs) ...@@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ asmlinkage int arm_syscall(int no, struct pt_regs *regs)
if not implemented, rather than raising SIGILL. This if not implemented, rather than raising SIGILL. This
way the calling program can gracefully determine whether way the calling program can gracefully determine whether
a feature is supported. */ a feature is supported. */
if (no <= 0x7ff) if ((no & 0xffff) <= 0x7ff)
return -ENOSYS; return -ENOSYS;
break; break;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment