Commit 926bbf14 authored by Ilkka Ollakka's avatar Ilkka Ollakka

Qt4: don't do playlist_model recursive remove as core signals for those anyway

parent 65bdaa29
...@@ -779,10 +779,8 @@ void PLModel::updateTreeItem( PLItem *item ) ...@@ -779,10 +779,8 @@ void PLModel::updateTreeItem( PLItem *item )
/************************* Actions ******************************/ /************************* Actions ******************************/
/** /**
* Deletion, here we have to do a ugly slow hack as we retrieve the full * Lets not worry about nodes children, we do refersh anyway when
* list of indexes to delete at once: when we delete a node and all of * core tells that playlist has changed, should give some more speed
* its children, we need to update the list.
* Todo: investigate whethere we can use ranges to be sure to delete all items?
*/ */
void PLModel::doDelete( QModelIndexList selected ) void PLModel::doDelete( QModelIndexList selected )
{ {
...@@ -796,8 +794,6 @@ void PLModel::doDelete( QModelIndexList selected ) ...@@ -796,8 +794,6 @@ void PLModel::doDelete( QModelIndexList selected )
if( index.column() != 0 ) continue; if( index.column() != 0 ) continue;
PLItem *item = getItem( index ); PLItem *item = getItem( index );
if( item->children.size() )
recurseDelete( item->children, &selected );
PL_LOCK; PL_LOCK;
playlist_DeleteFromInput( p_playlist, item->p_input, pl_Locked ); playlist_DeleteFromInput( p_playlist, item->p_input, pl_Locked );
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment