Commit 87ef957b authored by Rémi Denis-Courmont's avatar Rémi Denis-Courmont

Force an error when a function prototype is missing

If someone understands the stochastic process whereby GCC decides to
apply this function or not, please let me know.
parent 8ff1f7b5
...@@ -933,7 +933,7 @@ if test "${ac_cv_c_ntohl_sys_param_h}" != "no"; then ...@@ -933,7 +933,7 @@ if test "${ac_cv_c_ntohl_sys_param_h}" != "no"; then
fi fi
CFLAGS="${CFLAGS_save}" CFLAGS="${CFLAGS_save}"
RDC_PROG_CC_WFLAGS([all extra sign-compare undef pointer-arith bad-function-cast cast-align write-strings missing-prototypes volatile-register-var]) RDC_PROG_CC_WFLAGS([all extra sign-compare undef pointer-arith bad-function-cast cast-align write-strings missing-prototypes volatile-register-var error-implicit-function-declaration])
RDC_PROG_CC_FLAGS_IFELSE([-pipe]) RDC_PROG_CC_FLAGS_IFELSE([-pipe])
dnl Check for various optimization flags dnl Check for various optimization flags
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment