Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in
Toggle navigation
V
vlc
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Redmine
Redmine
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Operations
Operations
Metrics
Environments
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
videolan
vlc
Commits
36a94ee0
Commit
36a94ee0
authored
Oct 06, 2007
by
Damien Fouilleul
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
threads: win32 version of vlc_cond_timedwait()
parent
d1186576
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
102 additions
and
3 deletions
+102
-3
include/vlc_threads_funcs.h
include/vlc_threads_funcs.h
+102
-3
No files found.
include/vlc_threads_funcs.h
View file @
36a94ee0
...
...
@@ -566,10 +566,109 @@ static inline int __vlc_cond_timedwait( const char * psz_file, int i_line,
#elif defined( ST_INIT_IN_ST_H )
# error Unimplemented
#elif defined( UNDER_CE )
# error Unimplemented
mtime_t
delay_ms
=
(
deadline
-
mdate
())
/
1000
;
DWORD
result
;
if
(
delay_ms
<
0
)
delay_ms
=
0
;
p_condvar
->
i_waiting_threads
++
;
LeaveCriticalSection
(
&
p_mutex
->
csection
);
result
=
WaitForSingleObject
(
p_condvar
->
event
,
delay_ms
);
p_condvar
->
i_waiting_threads
--
;
/* Reacquire the mutex before returning. */
vlc_mutex_lock
(
p_mutex
);
i_res
=
(
int
)
result
;
#elif defined( WIN32 )
abort
();
# warning Unimplemented FIXME FIXME
DWORD
result
;
mtime_t
delay_ms
=
(
deadline
-
mdate
())
/
1000
;
if
(
delay_ms
<
0
)
delay_ms
=
0
;
if
(
!
p_condvar
->
semaphore
)
{
/* Increase our wait count */
p_condvar
->
i_waiting_threads
++
;
if
(
p_mutex
->
mutex
)
{
/* It is only possible to atomically release the mutex and
* initiate the waiting on WinNT/2K/XP. Win9x doesn't have
* SignalObjectAndWait(). */
result
=
p_condvar
->
SignalObjectAndWait
(
p_mutex
->
mutex
,
p_condvar
->
event
,
delay_ms
,
FALSE
);
}
else
{
LeaveCriticalSection
(
&
p_mutex
->
csection
);
result
=
WaitForSingleObject
(
p_condvar
->
event
,
delay_ms
);
}
p_condvar
->
i_waiting_threads
--
;
}
else
if
(
p_condvar
->
i_win9x_cv
==
1
)
{
int
i_waiting_threads
;
/* Wait for the gate to be open */
result
=
WaitForSingleObject
(
p_condvar
->
event
,
delay_ms
);
/* recaculate remaining delay */
delay_ms
=
(
deadline
-
mdate
())
/
1000
;
if
(
delay_ms
<
0
)
delay_ms
=
0
;
/* Increase our wait count */
p_condvar
->
i_waiting_threads
++
;
LeaveCriticalSection
(
&
p_mutex
->
csection
);
if
(
!
result
)
result
=
WaitForSingleObject
(
p_condvar
->
semaphore
,
delay_ms
);
/* Decrement and test must be atomic */
EnterCriticalSection
(
&
p_condvar
->
csection
);
/* Decrease our wait count */
i_waiting_threads
=
--
p_condvar
->
i_waiting_threads
;
LeaveCriticalSection
(
&
p_condvar
->
csection
);
/* Reopen the gate if we were the last waiting thread */
if
(
!
i_waiting_threads
)
SetEvent
(
p_condvar
->
event
);
}
else
{
int
i_waiting_threads
;
/* Increase our wait count */
p_condvar
->
i_waiting_threads
++
;
LeaveCriticalSection
(
&
p_mutex
->
csection
);
result
=
WaitForSingleObject
(
p_condvar
->
semaphore
,
delay_ms
);
/* Decrement and test must be atomic */
EnterCriticalSection
(
&
p_condvar
->
csection
);
/* Decrease our wait count */
i_waiting_threads
=
--
p_condvar
->
i_waiting_threads
;
LeaveCriticalSection
(
&
p_condvar
->
csection
);
/* Signal that the last waiting thread just went through */
if
(
!
i_waiting_threads
)
SetEvent
(
p_condvar
->
event
);
}
/* Reacquire the mutex before returning. */
vlc_mutex_lock
(
p_mutex
);
i_res
=
(
int
)
result
;
#elif defined( HAVE_KERNEL_SCHEDULER_H )
# error Unimplemented
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment