CONFIG_BITS is set to 32 for sparc32
and 64 for sparc64.

This allow us to use this symbol in for example header files
to ease unification of sparc32 and sparc64.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

When hardirq.h are removed from asm-generic/local.h a few
bits fails to build.  Fix these upfront.
Reported by Alexey Dobriyan.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Al asked: BTW, why does sparc64 export put_fs_struct?  Grepping the
kernel tree did not show any users of an exported put_fs_struct - so
drop the export.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Use sparc64 version of scatterlist.h.

There are three main differences:
    dma_addr_t replaces __u32
    dma_address replaces dvma_address
    dma_length replaces dvma_length

dma_addr_t is a u32 on sparc32.

Boot tested on sparc32.
Signed-off-by: Robert Reif <reif@earthlink.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Use the new asm/asm.h header to help commonize the
strlen assembler between 32-bit and 64-bit

While we're here, use proper linux/linkage.h macros
instead of by-hand stuff.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This will contain macros that help share assembler code
between the 32-bit and 64-bit platform.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Simple replacement, now the _nr is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Fix following sparse warnings:
symbol 'static_irqaction' was not declared. Should it be static?
symbol 'static_irq_count' was not declared. Should it be static?
symbol 'irq_action_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
symbol 'unexpected_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
symbol 'handler_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
returning void-valued expression
returning void-valued expression
returning void-valued expression
symbol 'init_IRQ' was not declared. Should it be static?

Warnings were fixed by addding proper declarations
and fixing return path of a few functions.

There remains several warnings all related to the floppy driver.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

o add decalrations to entry.h for functions only used from assembler
o add declaratiosn to kernel.h for functions only used from .c
o removed unused functions/extern declarations
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

o drop trailing whitespaces
o align a fix things properly
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Fix following warning:
arch/sparc/kernel/pmc.c:41:6: warning: symbol 'pmc_swift_idle'
was not declared. Should it be static?

It was not used outside this file - make it static
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Use sparc64 version of prom/printf.c.

The only differences for sparc32 is that prom_printf is no longer
exported for modules which should be OK.
Signed-off-by: Robert Reif <reif@earthlink.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Noticed by Robert Reif and Sam Ravnborg.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

o in sparc32 variant removed prom_halt in warning situations
o ifdef out sparc32 specific code
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

o Use C99 initializer for struct members
o fix code style issues
o Add KERN_WARNING to all printk
o Update prints to match sparc64
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This broke sparc64 in various ways.

Add an empty dummy hook in sparc32's prom_32.c so that we
can potentially handle things on that side similarly, and
in particular avoid a prom_common.c ifdef :-)
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

o use cpu_32.c as base
o move all sparc64 definitions to the common cpu.c
o use ifdef for the parts that differs and use cpu_32 as base
o spitfire.h required a CONFIG_SPARC64 guard to fix build on 32 bit
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Prepare cputable to include sparc64 versions
Declare it __initconst so it can be dropped after init
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

o declare variables from cpu_*.c
o declare function from cpu_32.c

To do this introduce a new header "kernel.h" which is local to kernel/
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Without fancy makefile rules it's not straightforward
to prevent both arch/sparc/kernel/audit.o and lib/audit.o
from both being used on sparc32.

Since arch/sparc/kernel/audit.c is identical to lib/audit.c
except some CONFIG_COMPAT protected sections of code, just
use it on sparc32 too as that's the simplest way to fix
this.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

If we cannot determine the CPU or FPU report
"Unknown CPU" or "Unknown FPU" like sparc64 does.

And report with KERN_ERR that we cannot determine the CPU.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Fixed style issues
Use C99 struct assignments
Use KERN_DEBUG for printk
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

To make this work we provide a dummy nop implementation
of of_fill_in_cpu_data() for sparc32.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Sparc64 uses a non-recursive sibling traversal algorithm
that never got propagated into the sparc32 copy of this
code.

Sync them up.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This makes it match what sparc64's version does.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Add final len assignment in sparc64's get_one_property() (it's necessary
to avoid unchecked return value warnings on the sparc32 side),
and mark name argument const on sparc32's copy.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Unfortunately there is some sparc32/sparc64 ifdef'ery in
here due to the difference in how the prom_firstprop()
and prom_nextprop() routines work.

This will be eliminated eventually.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This will be used in a subsequent changeset.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

All sparc64 specific, so only build this file on sparc64.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

A subsequent changeset will use this.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This is where common code implementations will go as we unify
32-bit and 64-bit OF device tree code.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This brings things in line with sparc64.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This is where common declarations will go as we unify
these files as much as possible into common code.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

A closer inspection revealed that these two files had identical
functionality - but the implementation of it differed slightly.

Base it on the sparc version as it was the best.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>