- 12 Jun, 2009 40 commits
-
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
the write_super method is used for (1) writing back the superblock periodically from pdflush (2) called just before ->sync_fs for data integerity syncs We don't need (1) because we have our own peridoc writeout through xfssyncd, and we don't need (2) because xfs_fs_sync_fs performs a proper synchronous superblock writeout after all other data and metadata has been written out. Also remove ->s_dirt tracking as it's only used to decide when too call ->write_super. Signed-off-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by:
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net> Signed-off-by:
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Jens Axboe authored
This should not trigger anymore, so kill it. Acked-by:
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk> Signed-off-by:
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Theodore Ts'o authored
Signed-off-by:
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
Theodore Ts'o authored
The only user of the i_cindex element in the inode structure is used is by the firewire drivers. As part of an attempt to slim down the inode structure to save memory --- since a typical Linux system will have hundreds of thousands if not millions of inodes cached, a reduction in the size inode has high leverage. The firewire driver does not need i_cindex in any fast path, so it's simple enough to calculate when it is needed, instead of wasting space in the inode structure. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Push down lock_super into ->write_super instances and remove it from the caller. Following filesystem don't need ->s_lock in ->write_super and are skipped: * bfs, nilfs2 - no other uses of s_lock and have internal locks in ->write_super * ext2 - uses BKL in ext2_write_super and has internal calls without s_lock * reiserfs - no other uses of s_lock as has reiserfs_write_lock (BKL) in ->write_super * xfs - no other uses of s_lock and uses internal lock (buffer lock on superblock buffer) to serialize ->write_super. Also xfs_fs_write_super is superflous and will go away in the next merge window Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
jffs2_write_super is only called from super.c and doesn't use any functionality from fs.c. So move it over to super.c and make it static there. [should go in through the vfs tree as it is a requirement for the next patch] Signed-off-by:
-
Al Viro authored
[folded fix from Jiri Slaby] Signed-off-by: -
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: -
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: -
Al Viro authored
Note that since we can't run into contention between remount_fs and write_super (due to exclusion on s_umount), we have to care only about filesystems that touch lock_super() on their own. Out of those ext3, ext4, hpfs, sysv and ufs do need it; fat doesn't since its ->remount_fs() only accesses assign-once data (basically, it's "we have no atime on directories and only have atime on files for vfat; force nodiratime and possibly noatime into *flags"). [folded a build fix from hch] Signed-off-by: -
Christoph Hellwig authored
Move BKL into ->put_super from the only caller. A couple of filesystems had trivial enough ->put_super (only kfree and NULLing of s_fs_info + stuff in there) to not get any locking: coda, cramfs, efs, hugetlbfs, omfs, qnx4, shmem, all others got the full treatment. Most of them probably don't need it, but I'd rather sort that out individually. Preferably after all the other BKL pushdowns in that area. [AV: original used to move lock_super() down as well; these changes are removed since we don't do lock_super() at all in generic_shutdown_super() now] [AV: fuse, btrfs and xfs are known to need no damn BKL, exempt] Signed-off-by:
-
Al Viro authored
We can't run into contention on it. All other callers of lock_super() either hold s_umount (and we have it exclusive) or hold an active reference to superblock in question, which prevents the call of generic_shutdown_super() while the reference is held. So we can replace lock_super(s) with get_fs_excl() in generic_shutdown_super() (and corresponding change for unlock_super(), of course). Since ext4 expects s_lock held for its put_super, take lock_super() into it. The rest of filesystems do not care at all. Signed-off-by: -
Al Viro authored
do_remount_sb() is fs/internal.h fodder, fsync_no_super() is long gone. Signed-off-by: -
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: -
Christoph Hellwig authored
Make sure a superblock really is writeable by checking MS_RDONLY under s_umount. sync_filesystems needed some re-arragement for that, but all but one sync_filesystem caller had the correct locking already so that we could add that check there. cachefiles grew s_umount locking. I've also added a WARN_ON to sync_filesystem to assert this for future callers. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Merge the write_super helper into sync_super and move the check for ->write_super earlier so that we can avoid grabbing a reference to a superblock that doesn't have it. While we're at it also add a little comment documenting sync_supers. Signed-off-by:
-
Alexey Dobriyan authored
d_unlinked() will be used in middle-term to ban checkpointing when opened but unlinked file is detected, and in long term, to detect such situation and special case on it. Signed-off-by:
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
We just did a full fs writeout using sync_filesystem before, and if that's not enough for the filesystem it can perform it's own writeout in ->put_super, which many filesystems already do. Move a call to foofs_write_super into every foofs_put_super for now to guarantee identical behaviour until it's cleaned up by the individual filesystem maintainers. Exceptions: - affs already has identical copy & pasted code at the beginning of affs_put_super so no need to do it twice. - xfs does the right thing without it and I have changes pending for the xfs tree touching this are so I don't really need conflicts here.. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Signed-off-by:
Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Signed-off-by:
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jan Kara authored
Introduce this function which just writes all the quota structures but avoids all the syncing and cache pruning work to expose quota structures to userspace. Use this function from __sync_filesystem when wait == 0. Signed-off-by:
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Currently the VFS calls vfs_dq_sync to sync out disk quotas for a given superblock. This is a small wrapper around sync_dquots which for the case of a non-NULL superblock is a small wrapper around quota_sync_sb. Just make quota_sync_sb global (rename it to sync_quota_sb) and call it directly. Also call it directly for those cases in quota.c that have a superblock and leave sync_dquots purely an iterator over sync_quota_sb and remove it's superblock argument. To make this nicer move the check for the lack of a quota_sync method from the callers into sync_quota_sb. [folded build fix from Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>] Signed-off-by:
-
Jan Kara authored
Rename the function so that it better describe what it really does. Also remove the unnecessary include of buffer_head.h. Signed-off-by:
-
Jan Kara authored
Move sync_filesystems(), __fsync_super(), fsync_super() from super.c to sync.c where it fits better. [build fixes folded] Signed-off-by:
-
Jan Kara authored
It is unnecessarily fragile to have two places (fsync_super() and do_sync()) doing data integrity sync of the filesystem. Alter __fsync_super() to accommodate needs of both callers and use it. So after this patch __fsync_super() is the only place where we gather all the calls needed to properly send all data on a filesystem to disk. Nice bonus is that we get a complete livelock avoidance and write_supers() is now only used for periodic writeback of superblocks. sync_blockdevs() introduced a couple of patches ago is gone now. [build fixes folded] Signed-off-by:
-
Jan Kara authored
__fsync_super() does the same thing as fsync_super(). So change the only caller to use fsync_super() and make __fsync_super() static. This removes unnecessarily duplicated call to sync_blockdev() and prepares ground for the changes to __fsync_super() in the following patches. Signed-off-by:
-
Jan Kara authored
sync_filesystems() has a condition that if wait == 0 and s_dirt == 0, then ->sync_fs() isn't called. This does not really make much sence since s_dirt is generally used by a filesystem to mean that ->write_super() needs to be called. But ->sync_fs() does different things. I even suspect that some filesystems (btrfs?) sets s_dirt just to fool this logic. Signed-off-by:
-
Jan Kara authored
So far, do_sync() called: sync_inodes(0); sync_supers(); sync_filesystems(0); sync_filesystems(1); sync_inodes(1); This ordering makes it kind of hard for filesystems as sync_inodes(0) need not submit all the IO (for example it skips inodes with I_SYNC set) so e.g. forcing transaction to disk in ->sync_fs() is not really enough. Therefore sys_sync has not been completely reliable on some filesystems (ext3, ext4, reiserfs, ocfs2 and others are hit by this) when racing e.g. with background writeback. A similar problem hits also other filesystems (e.g. ext2) because of write_supers() being called before the sync_inodes(1). Change the ordering of calls in do_sync() - this requires a new function sync_blockdevs() to preserve the property that block devices are always synced after write_super() / sync_fs() call. The same issue is fixed in __fsync_super() function used on umount / remount read-only. [AV: build fixes] Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Remove the unused s_async_list in the superblock, a leftover of the broken async inode deletion code that leaked into mainline. Having this in the middle of the sync/unmount path is not helpful for the following cleanups. Signed-off-by:
-
npiggin@suse.de authored
This function walks the s_files lock, and operates primarily on the files in a superblock, so it better belongs here (eg. see also fs_may_remount_ro). [AV: ... and it shouldn't be static after that move] Signed-off-by:
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Signed-off-by:
-
npiggin@suse.de authored
This patch speeds up lmbench lat_mmap test by about another 2% after the first patch. Before: avg = 462.286 std = 5.46106 After: avg = 453.12 std = 9.58257 (50 runs of each, stddev gives a reasonable confidence) It does this by introducing mnt_clone_write, which avoids some heavyweight operations of mnt_want_write if called on a vfsmount which we know already has a write count; and mnt_want_write_file, which can call mnt_clone_write if the file is open for write. After these two patches, mnt_want_write and mnt_drop_write go from 7% on the profile down to 1.3% (including mnt_clone_write). [AV: mnt_want_write_file() should take file alone and derive mnt from it; not only all callers have that form, but that's the only mnt about which we know that it's already held for write if file is opened for write] Cc: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
npiggin@suse.de authored
This patch speeds up lmbench lat_mmap test by about 8%. lat_mmap is set up basically to mmap a 64MB file on tmpfs, fault in its pages, then unmap it. A microbenchmark yes, but it exercises some important paths in the mm. Before: avg = 501.9 std = 14.7773 After: avg = 462.286 std = 5.46106 (50 runs of each, stddev gives a reasonable confidence, but there is quite a bit of variation there still) It does this by removing the complex per-cpu locking and counter-cache and replaces it with a percpu counter in struct vfsmount. This makes the code much simpler, and avoids spinlocks (although the msync is still pretty costly, unfortunately). It results in about 900 bytes smaller code too. It does increase the size of a vfsmount, however. It should also give a speedup on large systems if CPUs are frequently operating on different mounts (because the existing scheme has to operate on an atomic in the struct vfsmount when switching between mounts). But I'm most interested in the single threaded path performance for the moment. [AV: minor cleanup] Cc: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: -
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: -
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: -
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: -
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by:
-
