Skip to content

L
linux-davinci
Switch branch/tag
  1. 23 Sep, 2009 6 commits
    • Tyler Hicks's avatar
      eCryptfs: Filename encryption only supports password auth tokens · df6ad33b
      Tyler Hicks authored 
      Returns -ENOTSUPP when attempting to use filename encryption with
something other than a password authentication token, such as a private
token from openssl.  Using filename encryption with a userspace eCryptfs
key module is a future goal.  Until then, this patch handles the
situation a little better than simply using a BUG_ON().
Acked-by: default avatarSerge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net
Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      df6ad33b
    • Tyler Hicks's avatar
      eCryptfs: Check for O_RDONLY lower inodes when opening lower files · ac22ba23
      Tyler Hicks authored 
      If the lower inode is read-only, don't attempt to open the lower file
read/write and don't hand off the open request to the privileged
eCryptfs kthread for opening it read/write.  Instead, only try an
unprivileged, read-only open of the file and give up if that fails.
This patch fixes an oops when eCryptfs is mounted on top of a read-only
mount.
Acked-by: default avatarSerge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net
Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      ac22ba23
    • Tyler Hicks's avatar
      eCryptfs: Handle unrecognized tag 3 cipher codes · b0105eae
      Tyler Hicks authored 
      Returns an error when an unrecognized cipher code is present in a tag 3
packet or an ecryptfs_crypt_stat cannot be initialized.  Also sets an
crypt_stat->tfm error pointer to NULL to ensure that it will not be
incorrectly freed in ecryptfs_destroy_crypt_stat().
Acked-by: default avatarSerge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net
Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      b0105eae
    • Dave Hansen's avatar
      ecryptfs: improved dependency checking and reporting · 38268498
      Dave Hansen authored 
      So, I compiled a 2.6.31-rc5 kernel with ecryptfs and loaded its module.
When it came time to mount my filesystem, I got this in dmesg, and it
refused to mount:

[93577.776637] Unable to allocate crypto cipher with name [aes]; rc = [-2]
[93577.783280] Error attempting to initialize key TFM cipher with name = [aes]; rc = [-2]
[93577.791183] Error attempting to initialize cipher with name = [aes] and key size = [32]; rc = [-2]
[93577.800113] Error parsing options; rc = [-22]

I figured from the error message that I'd either forgotten to load "aes"
or that my key size was bogus.  Neither one of those was the case.  In
fact, I was missing the CRYPTO_ECB config option and the 'ecb' module.
Unfortunately, there's no trace of 'ecb' in that error message.

I've done two things to fix this.  First, I've modified ecryptfs's
Kconfig entry to select CRYPTO_ECB and CRYPTO_CBC.  I also took CRYPTO
out of the dependencies since the 'select' will take care of it for us.

I've also modified the error messages to print a string that should
contain both 'ecb' and 'aes' in my error case.  That will give any
future users a chance of finding the right modules and Kconfig options.

I also wonder if we should:

	select CRYPTO_AES if !EMBEDDED

since I think most ecryptfs users are using AES like me.

Cc: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com: Removed extra newline, 80-char violation]
Signed-off-by: default avatarTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      38268498
    • Roland Dreier's avatar
      eCryptfs: Fix lockdep-reported AB-BA mutex issue · aa06117f
      Roland Dreier authored 
      Lockdep reports the following valid-looking possible AB-BA deadlock with
global_auth_tok_list_mutex and keysig_list_mutex:

  ecryptfs_new_file_context() ->
      ecryptfs_copy_mount_wide_sigs_to_inode_sigs() ->
          mutex_lock(&mount_crypt_stat->global_auth_tok_list_mutex);
          -> ecryptfs_add_keysig() ->
              mutex_lock(&crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex);

vs

  ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set() ->
      mutex_lock(&crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex);
      -> ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig() ->
          mutex_lock(&mount_crypt_stat->global_auth_tok_list_mutex);

ie the two mutexes are taken in opposite orders in the two different
code paths.  I'm not sure if this is a real bug where two threads could
actually hit the two paths in parallel and deadlock, but it at least
makes lockdep impossible to use with ecryptfs since this report triggers
every time and disables future lockdep reporting.

Since ecryptfs_add_keysig() is called only from the single callsite in
ecryptfs_copy_mount_wide_sigs_to_inode_sigs(), the simplest fix seems to
be to move the lock of keysig_list_mutex back up outside of the where
global_auth_tok_list_mutex is taken.  This patch does that, and fixes
the lockdep report on my system (and ecryptfs still works OK).

The full output of lockdep fixed by this patch is:

=======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.31-2-generic #14~rbd2
-------------------------------------------------------
gdm/2640 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&mount_crypt_stat->global_auth_tok_list_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8121591e>] ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90

but task is already holding lock:
 (&crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81217728>] ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x58/0x2b0

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex){+.+.+.}:
       [<ffffffff8108c897>] check_prev_add+0x2a7/0x370
       [<ffffffff8108cfc1>] validate_chain+0x661/0x750
       [<ffffffff8108d2e7>] __lock_acquire+0x237/0x430
       [<ffffffff8108d585>] lock_acquire+0xa5/0x150
       [<ffffffff815526cd>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x3d0
       [<ffffffff81552b56>] mutex_lock_nested+0x46/0x60
       [<ffffffff8121526a>] ecryptfs_add_keysig+0x5a/0xb0
       [<ffffffff81213299>] ecryptfs_copy_mount_wide_sigs_to_inode_sigs+0x59/0xb0
       [<ffffffff81214b06>] ecryptfs_new_file_context+0xa6/0x1a0
       [<ffffffff8120e42a>] ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x4a/0x140
       [<ffffffff8120e54d>] ecryptfs_create+0x2d/0x60
       [<ffffffff8113a7d4>] vfs_create+0xb4/0xe0
       [<ffffffff8113a8c4>] __open_namei_create+0xc4/0x110
       [<ffffffff8113d1c1>] do_filp_open+0xa01/0xae0
       [<ffffffff8112d8d9>] do_sys_open+0x69/0x140
       [<ffffffff8112d9f0>] sys_open+0x20/0x30
       [<ffffffff81013132>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
       [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff

-> #0 (&mount_crypt_stat->global_auth_tok_list_mutex){+.+.+.}:
       [<ffffffff8108c675>] check_prev_add+0x85/0x370
       [<ffffffff8108cfc1>] validate_chain+0x661/0x750
       [<ffffffff8108d2e7>] __lock_acquire+0x237/0x430
       [<ffffffff8108d585>] lock_acquire+0xa5/0x150
       [<ffffffff815526cd>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x3d0
       [<ffffffff81552b56>] mutex_lock_nested+0x46/0x60
       [<ffffffff8121591e>] ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90
       [<ffffffff812177d5>] ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x105/0x2b0
       [<ffffffff81212f49>] ecryptfs_write_headers_virt+0xc9/0x120
       [<ffffffff8121306d>] ecryptfs_write_metadata+0xcd/0x200
       [<ffffffff8120e44b>] ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x6b/0x140
       [<ffffffff8120e54d>] ecryptfs_create+0x2d/0x60
       [<ffffffff8113a7d4>] vfs_create+0xb4/0xe0
       [<ffffffff8113a8c4>] __open_namei_create+0xc4/0x110
       [<ffffffff8113d1c1>] do_filp_open+0xa01/0xae0
       [<ffffffff8112d8d9>] do_sys_open+0x69/0x140
       [<ffffffff8112d9f0>] sys_open+0x20/0x30
       [<ffffffff81013132>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
       [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff

other info that might help us debug this:

2 locks held by gdm/2640:
 #0:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#11){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8113cb8b>] do_filp_open+0x3cb/0xae0
 #1:  (&crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81217728>] ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x58/0x2b0

stack backtrace:
Pid: 2640, comm: gdm Tainted: G         C 2.6.31-2-generic #14~rbd2
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8108b988>] print_circular_bug_tail+0xa8/0xf0
 [<ffffffff8108c675>] check_prev_add+0x85/0x370
 [<ffffffff81094912>] ? __module_text_address+0x12/0x60
 [<ffffffff8108cfc1>] validate_chain+0x661/0x750
 [<ffffffff81017275>] ? print_context_stack+0x85/0x140
 [<ffffffff81089c68>] ? find_usage_backwards+0x38/0x160
 [<ffffffff8108d2e7>] __lock_acquire+0x237/0x430
 [<ffffffff8108d585>] lock_acquire+0xa5/0x150
 [<ffffffff8121591e>] ? ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90
 [<ffffffff8108b0b0>] ? check_usage_backwards+0x0/0xb0
 [<ffffffff815526cd>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x3d0
 [<ffffffff8121591e>] ? ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90
 [<ffffffff8121591e>] ? ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90
 [<ffffffff8108c02c>] ? mark_held_locks+0x6c/0xa0
 [<ffffffff81125b0d>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xfd/0x1a0
 [<ffffffff8108c34d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14d/0x190
 [<ffffffff81552b56>] mutex_lock_nested+0x46/0x60
 [<ffffffff8121591e>] ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90
 [<ffffffff812177d5>] ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x105/0x2b0
 [<ffffffff81212f49>] ecryptfs_write_headers_virt+0xc9/0x120
 [<ffffffff8121306d>] ecryptfs_write_metadata+0xcd/0x200
 [<ffffffff81210240>] ? ecryptfs_init_persistent_file+0x60/0xe0
 [<ffffffff8120e44b>] ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x6b/0x140
 [<ffffffff8120e54d>] ecryptfs_create+0x2d/0x60
 [<ffffffff8113a7d4>] vfs_create+0xb4/0xe0
 [<ffffffff8113a8c4>] __open_namei_create+0xc4/0x110
 [<ffffffff8113d1c1>] do_filp_open+0xa01/0xae0
 [<ffffffff8129a93e>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x5e/0xb0
 [<ffffffff8155410b>] ? _spin_unlock+0x2b/0x40
 [<ffffffff81139e9b>] ? getname+0x3b/0x240
 [<ffffffff81148a5a>] ? alloc_fd+0xfa/0x140
 [<ffffffff8112d8d9>] do_sys_open+0x69/0x140
 [<ffffffff81553b8f>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
 [<ffffffff8112d9f0>] sys_open+0x20/0x30
 [<ffffffff81013132>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Signed-off-by: default avatarRoland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      aa06117f
    • Roland Dreier's avatar
      ecryptfs: Remove unneeded locking that triggers lockdep false positives · 05dafedb
      Roland Dreier authored 
      In ecryptfs_destroy_inode(), inode_info->lower_file_mutex is locked,
and just after the mutex is unlocked, the code does:

 	kmem_cache_free(ecryptfs_inode_info_cache, inode_info);

This means that if another context could possibly try to take the same
mutex as ecryptfs_destroy_inode(), then it could end up getting the
mutex just before the data structure containing the mutex is freed.
So any such use would be an obvious use-after-free bug (catchable with
slab poisoning or mutex debugging), and therefore the locking in
ecryptfs_destroy_inode() is not needed and can be dropped.

Similarly, in ecryptfs_destroy_crypt_stat(), crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex
is locked, and then the mutex is unlocked just before the code does:

 	memset(crypt_stat, 0, sizeof(struct ecryptfs_crypt_stat));

Therefore taking this mutex is similarly not necessary.

Removing this locking fixes false-positive lockdep reports such as the
following (and they are false-positives for exactly the same reason
that the locking is not needed):

=================================
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
2.6.31-2-generic #14~rbd3
---------------------------------
inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage.
kswapd0/323 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
 (&inode_info->lower_file_mutex){+.+.?.}, at: [<ffffffff81210d34>] ecryptfs_destroy_inode+0x34/0x100
{RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} state was registered at:
  [<ffffffff8108c02c>] mark_held_locks+0x6c/0xa0
  [<ffffffff8108c10f>] lockdep_trace_alloc+0xaf/0xe0
  [<ffffffff81125a51>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x41/0x1a0
  [<ffffffff8113117a>] get_empty_filp+0x7a/0x1a0
  [<ffffffff8112dd46>] dentry_open+0x36/0xc0
  [<ffffffff8121a36c>] ecryptfs_privileged_open+0x5c/0x2e0
  [<ffffffff81210283>] ecryptfs_init_persistent_file+0xa3/0xe0
  [<ffffffff8120e838>] ecryptfs_lookup_and_interpose_lower+0x278/0x380
  [<ffffffff8120f97a>] ecryptfs_lookup+0x12a/0x250
  [<ffffffff8113930a>] real_lookup+0xea/0x160
  [<ffffffff8113afc8>] do_lookup+0xb8/0xf0
  [<ffffffff8113b518>] __link_path_walk+0x518/0x870
  [<ffffffff8113bd9c>] path_walk+0x5c/0xc0
  [<ffffffff8113be5b>] do_path_lookup+0x5b/0xa0
  [<ffffffff8113bfe7>] user_path_at+0x57/0xa0
  [<ffffffff811340dc>] vfs_fstatat+0x3c/0x80
  [<ffffffff8113424b>] vfs_stat+0x1b/0x20
  [<ffffffff81134274>] sys_newstat+0x24/0x50
  [<ffffffff81013132>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
  [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
irq event stamp: 7811
hardirqs last  enabled at (7811): [<ffffffff810c037f>] call_rcu+0x5f/0x90
hardirqs last disabled at (7810): [<ffffffff810c0353>] call_rcu+0x33/0x90
softirqs last  enabled at (3764): [<ffffffff810631da>] __do_softirq+0x14a/0x220
softirqs last disabled at (3751): [<ffffffff8101440c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30

other info that might help us debug this:
2 locks held by kswapd0/323:
 #0:  (shrinker_rwsem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff810f67ed>] shrink_slab+0x3d/0x190
 #1:  (&type->s_umount_key#35){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff811429a1>] prune_dcache+0xd1/0x1b0

stack backtrace:
Pid: 323, comm: kswapd0 Tainted: G         C 2.6.31-2-generic #14~rbd3
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8108ad6c>] print_usage_bug+0x18c/0x1a0
 [<ffffffff8108aff0>] ? check_usage_forwards+0x0/0xc0
 [<ffffffff8108bac2>] mark_lock_irq+0xf2/0x280
 [<ffffffff8108bd87>] mark_lock+0x137/0x1d0
 [<ffffffff81164710>] ? fsnotify_clear_marks_by_inode+0x30/0xf0
 [<ffffffff8108bee6>] mark_irqflags+0xc6/0x1a0
 [<ffffffff8108d337>] __lock_acquire+0x287/0x430
 [<ffffffff8108d585>] lock_acquire+0xa5/0x150
 [<ffffffff81210d34>] ? ecryptfs_destroy_inode+0x34/0x100
 [<ffffffff8108d2e7>] ? __lock_acquire+0x237/0x430
 [<ffffffff815526ad>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x3d0
 [<ffffffff81210d34>] ? ecryptfs_destroy_inode+0x34/0x100
 [<ffffffff81164710>] ? fsnotify_clear_marks_by_inode+0x30/0xf0
 [<ffffffff81210d34>] ? ecryptfs_destroy_inode+0x34/0x100
 [<ffffffff8129a91e>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x5e/0xb0
 [<ffffffff81552b36>] mutex_lock_nested+0x46/0x60
 [<ffffffff81210d34>] ecryptfs_destroy_inode+0x34/0x100
 [<ffffffff81145d27>] destroy_inode+0x87/0xd0
 [<ffffffff81146b4c>] generic_delete_inode+0x12c/0x1a0
 [<ffffffff81145832>] iput+0x62/0x70
 [<ffffffff811423c8>] dentry_iput+0x98/0x110
 [<ffffffff81142550>] d_kill+0x50/0x80
 [<ffffffff81142623>] prune_one_dentry+0xa3/0xc0
 [<ffffffff811428b1>] __shrink_dcache_sb+0x271/0x290
 [<ffffffff811429d9>] prune_dcache+0x109/0x1b0
 [<ffffffff81142abf>] shrink_dcache_memory+0x3f/0x50
 [<ffffffff810f68dd>] shrink_slab+0x12d/0x190
 [<ffffffff810f9377>] balance_pgdat+0x4d7/0x640
 [<ffffffff8104c4c0>] ? finish_task_switch+0x40/0x150
 [<ffffffff810f63c0>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x60
 [<ffffffff810f95f7>] kswapd+0x117/0x170
 [<ffffffff810777a0>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
 [<ffffffff810f94e0>] ? kswapd+0x0/0x170
 [<ffffffff810773be>] kthread+0x9e/0xb0
 [<ffffffff8101430a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
 [<ffffffff81013c90>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
 [<ffffffff81077320>] ? kthread+0x0/0xb0
 [<ffffffff81014300>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Signed-off-by: default avatarRoland Dreier <roland@digitalvampire.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      05dafedb
  3. 24 Sep, 2009 34 commits