Skip to content

L
linux-davinci
Switch branch/tag
  1. 11 May, 2010 2 commits
    • David Howells's avatar
      CacheFiles: Fix occasional EIO on call to vfs_unlink() · c61ea31d
      David Howells authored 
      Fix an occasional EIO returned by a call to vfs_unlink():

	[ 4868.465413] CacheFiles: I/O Error: Unlink failed
	[ 4868.465444] FS-Cache: Cache cachefiles stopped due to I/O error
	[ 4947.320011] CacheFiles: File cache on md3 unregistering
	[ 4947.320041] FS-Cache: Withdrawing cache "mycache"
	[ 5127.348683] FS-Cache: Cache "mycache" added (type cachefiles)
	[ 5127.348716] CacheFiles: File cache on md3 registered
	[ 7076.871081] CacheFiles: I/O Error: Unlink failed
	[ 7076.871130] FS-Cache: Cache cachefiles stopped due to I/O error
	[ 7116.780891] CacheFiles: File cache on md3 unregistering
	[ 7116.780937] FS-Cache: Withdrawing cache "mycache"
	[ 7296.813394] FS-Cache: Cache "mycache" added (type cachefiles)
	[ 7296.813432] CacheFiles: File cache on md3 registered

What happens is this:

 (1) A cached NFS file is seen to have become out of date, so NFS retires the
     object and immediately acquires a new object with the same key.

 (2) Retirement of the old object is done asynchronously - so the lookup/create
     to generate the new object may be done first.

     This can be a problem as the old object and the new object must exist at
     the same point in the backing filesystem (i.e. they must have the same
     pathname).

 (3) The lookup for the new object sees that a backing file already exists,
     checks to see whether it is valid and sees that it isn't.  It then deletes
     that file and creates a new one on disk.

 (4) The retirement phase for the old file is then performed.  It tries to
     delete the dentry it has, but ext4_unlink() returns -EIO because the inode
     attached to that dentry no longer matches the inode number associated with
     the filename in the parent directory.

The trace below shows this quite well.

	[md5sum] ==> __fscache_relinquish_cookie(ffff88002d12fb58{NFS.fh,ffff88002ce62100},1)
	[md5sum] ==> __fscache_acquire_cookie({NFS.server},{NFS.fh},ffff88002ce62100)

NFS has retired the old cookie and asked for a new one.

	[kslowd] ==> fscache_object_state_machine({OBJ52,OBJECT_ACTIVE,24})
	[kslowd] <== fscache_object_state_machine() [->OBJECT_DYING]
	[kslowd] ==> fscache_object_state_machine({OBJ53,OBJECT_INIT,0})
	[kslowd] <== fscache_object_state_machine() [->OBJECT_LOOKING_UP]
	[kslowd] ==> fscache_object_state_machine({OBJ52,OBJECT_DYING,24})
	[kslowd] <== fscache_object_state_machine() [->OBJECT_RECYCLING]

The old object (OBJ52) is going through the terminal states to get rid of it,
whilst the new object - (OBJ53) - is coming into being.

	[kslowd] ==> fscache_object_state_machine({OBJ53,OBJECT_LOOKING_UP,0})
	[kslowd] ==> cachefiles_walk_to_object({ffff88003029d8b8},OBJ53,@68,)
	[kslowd] lookup '@68'
	[kslowd] next -> ffff88002ce41bd0 positive
	[kslowd] advance
	[kslowd] lookup 'Es0g00og0_Nd_XCYe3BOzvXrsBLMlN6aw16M1htaA'
	[kslowd] next -> ffff8800369faac8 positive

The new object has looked up the subdir in which the file would be in (getting
dentry ffff88002ce41bd0) and then looked up the file itself (getting dentry
ffff8800369faac8).

	[kslowd] validate 'Es0g00og0_Nd_XCYe3BOzvXrsBLMlN6aw16M1htaA'
	[kslowd] ==> cachefiles_bury_object(,'@68','Es0g00og0_Nd_XCYe3BOzvXrsBLMlN6aw16M1htaA')
	[kslowd] remove ffff8800369faac8 from ffff88002ce41bd0
	[kslowd] unlink stale object
	[kslowd] <== cachefiles_bury_object() = 0

It then checks the file's xattrs to see if it's valid.  NFS says that the
auxiliary data indicate the file is out of date (obvious to us - that's why NFS
ditched the old version and got a new one).  CacheFiles then deletes the old
file (dentry ffff8800369faac8).

	[kslowd] redo lookup
	[kslowd] lookup 'Es0g00og0_Nd_XCYe3BOzvXrsBLMlN6aw16M1htaA'
	[kslowd] next -> ffff88002cd94288 negative
	[kslowd] create -> ffff88002cd94288{ffff88002cdaf238{ino=148247}}

CacheFiles then redoes the lookup and gets a negative result in a new dentry
(ffff88002cd94288) which it then creates a file for.

	[kslowd] ==> cachefiles_mark_object_active(,OBJ53)
	[kslowd] <== cachefiles_mark_object_active() = 0
	[kslowd] === OBTAINED_OBJECT ===
	[kslowd] <== cachefiles_walk_to_object() = 0 [148247]
	[kslowd] <== fscache_object_state_machine() [->OBJECT_AVAILABLE]

The new object is then marked active and the state machine moves to the
available state - at which point NFS can start filling the object.

	[kslowd] ==> fscache_object_state_machine({OBJ52,OBJECT_RECYCLING,20})
	[kslowd] ==> fscache_release_object()
	[kslowd] ==> cachefiles_drop_object({OBJ52,2})
	[kslowd] ==> cachefiles_delete_object(,OBJ52{ffff8800369faac8})

The old object, meanwhile, goes on with being retired.  If allocation occurs
first, cachefiles_delete_object() has to wait for dir->d_inode->i_mutex to
become available before it can continue.

	[kslowd] ==> cachefiles_bury_object(,'@68','Es0g00og0_Nd_XCYe3BOzvXrsBLMlN6aw16M1htaA')
	[kslowd] remove ffff8800369faac8 from ffff88002ce41bd0
	[kslowd] unlink stale object
	EXT4-fs warning (device sda6): ext4_unlink: Inode number mismatch in unlink (148247!=148193)
	CacheFiles: I/O Error: Unlink failed
	FS-Cache: Cache cachefiles stopped due to I/O error

CacheFiles then tries to delete the file for the old object, but the dentry it
has (ffff8800369faac8) no longer points to a valid inode for that directory
entry, and so ext4_unlink() returns -EIO when de->inode does not match i_ino.

	[kslowd] <== cachefiles_bury_object() = -5
	[kslowd] <== cachefiles_delete_object() = -5
	[kslowd] <== fscache_object_state_machine() [->OBJECT_DEAD]
	[kslowd] ==> fscache_object_state_machine({OBJ53,OBJECT_AVAILABLE,0})
	[kslowd] <== fscache_object_state_machine() [->OBJECT_ACTIVE]

(Note that the above trace includes extra information beyond that produced by
the upstream code).

The fix is to note when an object that is being retired has had its object
deleted preemptively by a replacement object that is being created, and to
skip the second removal attempt in such a case.
Reported-by: default avatarGreg M <gregm@servu.net.au>
Reported-by: default avatarMark Moseley <moseleymark@gmail.com>
Reported-by: default avatarRomain DEGEZ <romain.degez@smartjog.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      c61ea31d
    • Alex Chiang's avatar
      ACPI: sleep: eliminate duplicate entries in acpisleep_dmi_table[] · 7d6fb7bd
      Alex Chiang authored 
      Duplicate entries ended up acpisleep_dmi_table[] by accident.
They don't hurt functionality, but they are ugly, so let's get
rid of them.

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Chiang <achiang@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      7d6fb7bd
  3. 10 May, 2010 8 commits
  5. 07 May, 2010 15 commits
  7. 06 May, 2010 15 commits