Commit f05337c6 authored by Pavel Shilovsky's avatar Pavel Shilovsky Committed by Steve French

not overwriting file_lock structure after GET_LK

If we have preventing lock, cifs should overwrite file_lock structure
with info about preventing lock. If we haven't preventing lock, cifs
should leave it unchanged except for the lock type (change it to F_UNLCK).
Signed-off-by: default avatarPavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
parent 6513a81e
......@@ -1810,8 +1810,21 @@ CIFSSMBPosixLock(const int xid, struct cifsTconInfo *tcon,
}
parm_data = (struct cifs_posix_lock *)
((char *)&pSMBr->hdr.Protocol + data_offset);
if (parm_data->lock_type == cpu_to_le16(CIFS_UNLCK))
if (parm_data->lock_type == __constant_cpu_to_le16(CIFS_UNLCK))
pLockData->fl_type = F_UNLCK;
else {
if (parm_data->lock_type ==
__constant_cpu_to_le16(CIFS_RDLCK))
pLockData->fl_type = F_RDLCK;
else if (parm_data->lock_type ==
__constant_cpu_to_le16(CIFS_WRLCK))
pLockData->fl_type = F_WRLCK;
pLockData->fl_start = parm_data->start;
pLockData->fl_end = parm_data->start +
parm_data->length - 1;
pLockData->fl_pid = parm_data->pid;
}
}
plk_err_exit:
......
......@@ -838,8 +838,32 @@ int cifs_lock(struct file *file, int cmd, struct file_lock *pfLock)
} else {
/* if rc == ERR_SHARING_VIOLATION ? */
rc = 0; /* do not change lock type to unlock
since range in use */
rc = 0;
if (lockType & LOCKING_ANDX_SHARED_LOCK) {
pfLock->fl_type = F_WRLCK;
} else {
rc = CIFSSMBLock(xid, tcon, netfid, length,
pfLock->fl_start, 0, 1,
lockType | LOCKING_ANDX_SHARED_LOCK,
0 /* wait flag */);
if (rc == 0) {
rc = CIFSSMBLock(xid, tcon, netfid,
length, pfLock->fl_start, 1, 0,
lockType |
LOCKING_ANDX_SHARED_LOCK,
0 /* wait flag */);
pfLock->fl_type = F_RDLCK;
if (rc != 0)
cERROR(1, ("Error unlocking "
"previously locked range %d "
"during test of lock", rc));
rc = 0;
} else {
pfLock->fl_type = F_WRLCK;
rc = 0;
}
}
}
FreeXid(xid);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment