Commit eeb61f71 authored by Al Viro's avatar Al Viro Committed by Linus Torvalds

missing bits of net-namespace / sysctl

Piss-poor sysctl registration API strikes again, film at 11...

What we really need is _pathname_ required to be present in already
registered table, so that kernel could warn about bad order.  That's the
next target for sysctl stuff (and generally saner and more explicit
order of initialization of ipv[46] internals wouldn't hurt either).

For the time being, here are full fixups required by ..._rotable()
stuff; we make per-net sysctl sets descendents of "ro" one and make sure
that sufficient skeleton is there before we start registering per-net
sysctls.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent bfbcf034
...@@ -608,6 +608,8 @@ extern struct ctl_table *ipv6_icmp_sysctl_init(struct net *net); ...@@ -608,6 +608,8 @@ extern struct ctl_table *ipv6_icmp_sysctl_init(struct net *net);
extern struct ctl_table *ipv6_route_sysctl_init(struct net *net); extern struct ctl_table *ipv6_route_sysctl_init(struct net *net);
extern int ipv6_sysctl_register(void); extern int ipv6_sysctl_register(void);
extern void ipv6_sysctl_unregister(void); extern void ipv6_sysctl_unregister(void);
extern int ipv6_static_sysctl_register(void);
extern void ipv6_static_sysctl_unregister(void);
#endif #endif
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */ #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
......
...@@ -204,6 +204,4 @@ static inline struct inet_peer *rt_get_peer(struct rtable *rt) ...@@ -204,6 +204,4 @@ static inline struct inet_peer *rt_get_peer(struct rtable *rt)
return rt->peer; return rt->peer;
} }
extern ctl_table ipv4_route_table[];
#endif /* _ROUTE_H */ #endif /* _ROUTE_H */
...@@ -2914,7 +2914,7 @@ static int ipv4_sysctl_rtcache_flush_strategy(ctl_table *table, ...@@ -2914,7 +2914,7 @@ static int ipv4_sysctl_rtcache_flush_strategy(ctl_table *table,
return 0; return 0;
} }
ctl_table ipv4_route_table[] = { static ctl_table ipv4_route_table[] = {
{ {
.ctl_name = NET_IPV4_ROUTE_GC_THRESH, .ctl_name = NET_IPV4_ROUTE_GC_THRESH,
.procname = "gc_thresh", .procname = "gc_thresh",
...@@ -3216,6 +3216,15 @@ int __init ip_rt_init(void) ...@@ -3216,6 +3216,15 @@ int __init ip_rt_init(void)
return rc; return rc;
} }
/*
* We really need to sanitize the damn ipv4 init order, then all
* this nonsense will go away.
*/
void __init ip_static_sysctl_init(void)
{
register_sysctl_paths(ipv4_route_path, ipv4_route_table);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ip_select_ident); EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ip_select_ident);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ip_route_input); EXPORT_SYMBOL(ip_route_input);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ip_route_output_key); EXPORT_SYMBOL(ip_route_output_key);
...@@ -401,13 +401,6 @@ static struct ctl_table ipv4_table[] = { ...@@ -401,13 +401,6 @@ static struct ctl_table ipv4_table[] = {
.proc_handler = &ipv4_local_port_range, .proc_handler = &ipv4_local_port_range,
.strategy = &ipv4_sysctl_local_port_range, .strategy = &ipv4_sysctl_local_port_range,
}, },
{
.ctl_name = NET_IPV4_ROUTE,
.procname = "route",
.maxlen = 0,
.mode = 0555,
.child = ipv4_route_table
},
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST #ifdef CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST
{ {
.ctl_name = NET_IPV4_IGMP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS, .ctl_name = NET_IPV4_IGMP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS,
...@@ -882,11 +875,4 @@ static __init int sysctl_ipv4_init(void) ...@@ -882,11 +875,4 @@ static __init int sysctl_ipv4_init(void)
return 0; return 0;
} }
/* set enough of tree skeleton to get rid of ordering problems */
void __init ip_static_sysctl_init(void)
{
static ctl_table table[1];
register_sysctl_paths(net_ipv4_ctl_path, table);
}
__initcall(sysctl_ipv4_init); __initcall(sysctl_ipv4_init);
...@@ -934,6 +934,11 @@ static int __init inet6_init(void) ...@@ -934,6 +934,11 @@ static int __init inet6_init(void)
if (err) if (err)
goto out_unregister_sock; goto out_unregister_sock;
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
err = ipv6_static_sysctl_register();
if (err)
goto static_sysctl_fail;
#endif
/* /*
* ipngwg API draft makes clear that the correct semantics * ipngwg API draft makes clear that the correct semantics
* for TCP and UDP is to consider one TCP and UDP instance * for TCP and UDP is to consider one TCP and UDP instance
...@@ -1058,6 +1063,10 @@ ipmr_fail: ...@@ -1058,6 +1063,10 @@ ipmr_fail:
icmp_fail: icmp_fail:
unregister_pernet_subsys(&inet6_net_ops); unregister_pernet_subsys(&inet6_net_ops);
register_pernet_fail: register_pernet_fail:
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
ipv6_static_sysctl_unregister();
static_sysctl_fail:
#endif
cleanup_ipv6_mibs(); cleanup_ipv6_mibs();
out_unregister_sock: out_unregister_sock:
sock_unregister(PF_INET6); sock_unregister(PF_INET6);
...@@ -1113,6 +1122,9 @@ static void __exit inet6_exit(void) ...@@ -1113,6 +1122,9 @@ static void __exit inet6_exit(void)
rawv6_exit(); rawv6_exit();
unregister_pernet_subsys(&inet6_net_ops); unregister_pernet_subsys(&inet6_net_ops);
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
ipv6_static_sysctl_unregister();
#endif
cleanup_ipv6_mibs(); cleanup_ipv6_mibs();
proto_unregister(&rawv6_prot); proto_unregister(&rawv6_prot);
proto_unregister(&udplitev6_prot); proto_unregister(&udplitev6_prot);
......
...@@ -150,3 +150,19 @@ void ipv6_sysctl_unregister(void) ...@@ -150,3 +150,19 @@ void ipv6_sysctl_unregister(void)
unregister_net_sysctl_table(ip6_header); unregister_net_sysctl_table(ip6_header);
unregister_pernet_subsys(&ipv6_sysctl_net_ops); unregister_pernet_subsys(&ipv6_sysctl_net_ops);
} }
static struct ctl_table_header *ip6_base;
int ipv6_static_sysctl_register(void)
{
static struct ctl_table empty[1];
ip6_base = register_net_sysctl_rotable(net_ipv6_ctl_path, empty);
if (ip6_base == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
return 0;
}
void ipv6_static_sysctl_unregister(void)
{
unregister_net_sysctl_table(ip6_base);
}
...@@ -73,7 +73,9 @@ static struct ctl_table_root net_sysctl_ro_root = { ...@@ -73,7 +73,9 @@ static struct ctl_table_root net_sysctl_ro_root = {
static int sysctl_net_init(struct net *net) static int sysctl_net_init(struct net *net)
{ {
setup_sysctl_set(&net->sysctls, NULL, is_seen); setup_sysctl_set(&net->sysctls,
&net_sysctl_ro_root.default_set,
is_seen);
return 0; return 0;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment