Commit eb609e52 authored by Srinivasa Ds's avatar Srinivasa Ds Committed by Paul Mackerras

[POWERPC] Transparently handle <.symbol> lookup for kprobes

When data symbols are not present in kernel image, user needs to add
dot(".") before function name explicitly, that he wants to probe in kprobe
module on ppc64.

for ex:-
When data symbols are missing on ppc64,
====================
[root@llm27lp1 ~]# cat /proc/kallsyms | grep do_fork
c00000000006283c T .do_fork
==============================
User needs add "." to "do_fork"

kp.symbol_name = ".do_fork";
============================

This makes kprobe modules unportable.  This fixes the problem.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSrinivasa Ds <srinivasa@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAnanth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
parent 14d1d2f2
......@@ -64,6 +64,12 @@ typedef unsigned int kprobe_opcode_t;
addr = *(kprobe_opcode_t **)addr; \
} else if (name[0] != '.') \
addr = *(kprobe_opcode_t **)addr; \
} else { \
char dot_name[KSYM_NAME_LEN+1]; \
dot_name[0] = '.'; \
dot_name[1] = '\0'; \
strncat(dot_name, name, KSYM_NAME_LEN); \
addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)kallsyms_lookup_name(dot_name); \
} \
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment