Commit e9d65725 authored by Li Zefan's avatar Li Zefan Committed by Ingo Molnar

lockdep: Fix missing entries in /proc/lock_chains

Two entries are missing in the output of /proc/lock_chains.

One is chains[1]. When lc_next() is called the 1st time,
chains[0] is returned. And when it's called the 2nd time,
chains[2] is returned.

The other missing ons is, when lc_start() is called the 2nd
time, we should start from chains[@pos-1] but not chains[@pos],
because pos == 0 is the header.
Signed-off-by: default avatarLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
LKML-Reference: <4A88ED25.2040306@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 21227434
......@@ -160,8 +160,8 @@ static void *lc_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
else {
chain = v;
if (*pos < nr_lock_chains)
chain = lock_chains + *pos;
if (*pos - 1 < nr_lock_chains)
chain = lock_chains + (*pos - 1);
else
chain = NULL;
}
......@@ -174,8 +174,8 @@ static void *lc_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
if (*pos == 0)
return SEQ_START_TOKEN;
if (*pos < nr_lock_chains)
return lock_chains + *pos;
if (*pos - 1 < nr_lock_chains)
return lock_chains + (*pos - 1);
return NULL;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment