Commit e9145016 authored by Alan D. Brunelle's avatar Alan D. Brunelle Committed by Tony Luck

[IA64] Fix unlock ordering in smp_callin

One should normally unlock in the reverse order of the lock calls,
and in this case there certainly is no reason not to.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlan D. Brunelle <alan.brunelle@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
parent e4b05d40
...@@ -400,9 +400,9 @@ smp_callin (void) ...@@ -400,9 +400,9 @@ smp_callin (void)
/* Setup the per cpu irq handling data structures */ /* Setup the per cpu irq handling data structures */
__setup_vector_irq(cpuid); __setup_vector_irq(cpuid);
cpu_set(cpuid, cpu_online_map); cpu_set(cpuid, cpu_online_map);
unlock_ipi_calllock();
per_cpu(cpu_state, cpuid) = CPU_ONLINE; per_cpu(cpu_state, cpuid) = CPU_ONLINE;
spin_unlock(&vector_lock); spin_unlock(&vector_lock);
unlock_ipi_calllock();
smp_setup_percpu_timer(); smp_setup_percpu_timer();
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment