Commit e53da5d6 authored by Manfred Spraul's avatar Manfred Spraul Committed by james toy

Reduce the amount of scanning of the list of pending semaphore operations:

If try_atomic_semop failed, then no changes were applied.  Thus no need to
restart.

Additionally, this patch correct an incorrect comment: It's possible to
wait for arbitrary semaphore values (do a dec by <x>, wait-for-zero, inc
by <x> in one atomic operation)

Both changes are from Nick Piggin, the patch is the result of a different
split of the individual changes.
Signed-off-by: default avatarManfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Pierre Peiffer <peifferp@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
parent 04331304
...@@ -445,13 +445,13 @@ again: ...@@ -445,13 +445,13 @@ again:
* of the completed operation: * of the completed operation:
* - if the operation modified the array, then restart from the * - if the operation modified the array, then restart from the
* head of the queue and check for threads that might be * head of the queue and check for threads that might be
* waiting for semaphore values to become 0. * waiting for the new semaphore values.
* - if the operation didn't modify the array, then just * - if the operation didn't modify the array, then just
* continue. * continue.
*/ */
alter = q->alter; alter = q->alter;
wake_up_sem_queue(q, error); wake_up_sem_queue(q, error);
if (alter) if (alter && !error)
goto again; goto again;
} }
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment