Commit e51a67a9 authored by Eric Dumazet's avatar Eric Dumazet Committed by David S. Miller

net: ip_push_pending_frames() fix

After commit 2b85a34e
(net: No more expensive sock_hold()/sock_put() on each tx)
we do not take any more references on sk->sk_refcnt on outgoing packets.

I forgot to delete two __sock_put() from ip_push_pending_frames()
and ip6_push_pending_frames().
Reported-by: default avatarEmil S Tantilov <emils.tantilov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Tested-by: default avatarEmil S Tantilov <emils.tantilov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent e912b114
......@@ -1243,7 +1243,6 @@ int ip_push_pending_frames(struct sock *sk)
skb->len += tmp_skb->len;
skb->data_len += tmp_skb->len;
skb->truesize += tmp_skb->truesize;
__sock_put(tmp_skb->sk);
tmp_skb->destructor = NULL;
tmp_skb->sk = NULL;
}
......
......@@ -1484,7 +1484,6 @@ int ip6_push_pending_frames(struct sock *sk)
skb->len += tmp_skb->len;
skb->data_len += tmp_skb->len;
skb->truesize += tmp_skb->truesize;
__sock_put(tmp_skb->sk);
tmp_skb->destructor = NULL;
tmp_skb->sk = NULL;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment