Commit e2fddf5e authored by Daniel Lezcano's avatar Daniel Lezcano Committed by David S. Miller

[IPV6]: Make af_inet6 to check ip6_route_init return value.

The af_inet6 initialization function does not check the return code of
the route initilization, so if something goes wrong, the protocol
initialization will continue anyway.  This patch takes into account
the modification made in the different route's initialization
subroutines to check the return value and to make the protocol
initialization to fail.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
Acked-by: default avatarBenjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@bull.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 433d49c3
......@@ -849,7 +849,9 @@ static int __init inet6_init(void)
if (if6_proc_init())
goto proc_if6_fail;
#endif
ip6_route_init();
err = ip6_route_init();
if (err)
goto ip6_route_fail;
ip6_flowlabel_init();
err = addrconf_init();
if (err)
......@@ -874,6 +876,7 @@ out:
addrconf_fail:
ip6_flowlabel_cleanup();
ip6_route_cleanup();
ip6_route_fail:
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
if6_proc_exit();
proc_if6_fail:
......@@ -904,6 +907,7 @@ icmp_fail:
cleanup_ipv6_mibs();
out_unregister_sock:
sock_unregister(PF_INET6);
rtnl_unregister_all(PF_INET6);
out_unregister_raw_proto:
proto_unregister(&rawv6_prot);
out_unregister_udplite_proto:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment