Commit d26be99a authored by Oleg Nesterov's avatar Oleg Nesterov Committed by james toy

Move the call to do_signal_stop() down, after tracehook call. This makes

->group_stop_count condition visible to tracers before do_signal_stop()
will participate in this group-stop.

Currently the patch has no effect, tracehook_get_signal() always returns 0.
Signed-off-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarRoland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
parent b6b0d16c
...@@ -1810,11 +1810,6 @@ relock: ...@@ -1810,11 +1810,6 @@ relock:
for (;;) { for (;;) {
struct k_sigaction *ka; struct k_sigaction *ka;
if (unlikely(signal->group_stop_count > 0) &&
do_signal_stop(0))
goto relock;
/* /*
* Tracing can induce an artifical signal and choose sigaction. * Tracing can induce an artifical signal and choose sigaction.
* The return value in @signr determines the default action, * The return value in @signr determines the default action,
...@@ -1826,6 +1821,10 @@ relock: ...@@ -1826,6 +1821,10 @@ relock:
if (unlikely(signr != 0)) if (unlikely(signr != 0))
ka = return_ka; ka = return_ka;
else { else {
if (unlikely(signal->group_stop_count > 0) &&
do_signal_stop(0))
goto relock;
signr = dequeue_signal(current, &current->blocked, signr = dequeue_signal(current, &current->blocked,
info); info);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment