Commit cd4d8fda authored by Patrick Ohly's avatar Patrick Ohly Committed by David S. Miller

net: kernel panic in dev_hard_start_xmit: remove faulty software TX time stamping

The current implementation of the TX software time stamping fallback is
faulty because it accesses the skb after ndo_start_xmit() returns
successfully. This patch removes the fallback, which fixes kernel panics
seen during stress tests. Hardware time stamping is not affected by this
removal.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPatrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarEmil Tantilov <emil.s.tantilov@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent be0c22a4
...@@ -1672,16 +1672,6 @@ static int dev_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *skb) ...@@ -1672,16 +1672,6 @@ static int dev_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *skb)
return 0; return 0;
} }
static void tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
union skb_shared_tx *shtx =
skb_tx(skb);
if (unlikely(shtx->software &&
!shtx->in_progress)) {
skb_tstamp_tx(skb, NULL);
}
}
int dev_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, int dev_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
struct netdev_queue *txq) struct netdev_queue *txq)
{ {
...@@ -1715,8 +1705,6 @@ int dev_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, ...@@ -1715,8 +1705,6 @@ int dev_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
* the skb destructor before the call and restoring it * the skb destructor before the call and restoring it
* afterwards, then doing the skb_orphan() ourselves? * afterwards, then doing the skb_orphan() ourselves?
*/ */
if (likely(!rc))
tstamp_tx(skb);
return rc; return rc;
} }
...@@ -1732,7 +1720,6 @@ gso: ...@@ -1732,7 +1720,6 @@ gso:
skb->next = nskb; skb->next = nskb;
return rc; return rc;
} }
tstamp_tx(skb);
if (unlikely(netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq) && skb->next)) if (unlikely(netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq) && skb->next))
return NETDEV_TX_BUSY; return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
} while (skb->next); } while (skb->next);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment