Commit cb469845 authored by Steven Rostedt's avatar Steven Rostedt Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched: RT-balance, add new methods to sched_class

Dmitry Adamushko found that the current implementation of the RT
balancing code left out changes to the sched_setscheduler and
rt_mutex_setprio.

This patch addresses this issue by adding methods to the schedule classes
to handle being switched out of (switched_from) and being switched into
(switched_to) a sched_class. Also a method for changing of priorities
is also added (prio_changed).

This patch also removes some duplicate logic between rt_mutex_setprio and
sched_setscheduler.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 9a897c5a
......@@ -855,6 +855,13 @@ struct sched_class {
void (*join_domain)(struct rq *rq);
void (*leave_domain)(struct rq *rq);
void (*switched_from) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task,
int running);
void (*switched_to) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task,
int running);
void (*prio_changed) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task,
int oldprio, int running);
};
struct load_weight {
......
......@@ -1152,6 +1152,18 @@ static inline void __set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int cpu)
#endif
}
static inline void check_class_changed(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
const struct sched_class *prev_class,
int oldprio, int running)
{
if (prev_class != p->sched_class) {
if (prev_class->switched_from)
prev_class->switched_from(rq, p, running);
p->sched_class->switched_to(rq, p, running);
} else
p->sched_class->prio_changed(rq, p, oldprio, running);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
......@@ -4017,6 +4029,7 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
unsigned long flags;
int oldprio, on_rq, running;
struct rq *rq;
const struct sched_class *prev_class = p->sched_class;
BUG_ON(prio < 0 || prio > MAX_PRIO);
......@@ -4042,18 +4055,10 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
if (on_rq) {
if (running)
p->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq);
enqueue_task(rq, p, 0);
/*
* Reschedule if we are currently running on this runqueue and
* our priority decreased, or if we are not currently running on
* this runqueue and our priority is higher than the current's
*/
if (running) {
if (p->prio > oldprio)
resched_task(rq->curr);
} else {
check_preempt_curr(rq, p);
}
check_class_changed(rq, p, prev_class, oldprio, running);
}
task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
}
......@@ -4253,6 +4258,7 @@ int sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
{
int retval, oldprio, oldpolicy = -1, on_rq, running;
unsigned long flags;
const struct sched_class *prev_class = p->sched_class;
struct rq *rq;
/* may grab non-irq protected spin_locks */
......@@ -4346,18 +4352,10 @@ recheck:
if (on_rq) {
if (running)
p->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq);
activate_task(rq, p, 0);
/*
* Reschedule if we are currently running on this runqueue and
* our priority decreased, or if we are not currently running on
* this runqueue and our priority is higher than the current's
*/
if (running) {
if (p->prio > oldprio)
resched_task(rq->curr);
} else {
check_preempt_curr(rq, p);
}
check_class_changed(rq, p, prev_class, oldprio, running);
}
__task_rq_unlock(rq);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
......
......@@ -1280,6 +1280,42 @@ static void task_new_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
resched_task(rq->curr);
}
/*
* Priority of the task has changed. Check to see if we preempt
* the current task.
*/
static void prio_changed_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
int oldprio, int running)
{
/*
* Reschedule if we are currently running on this runqueue and
* our priority decreased, or if we are not currently running on
* this runqueue and our priority is higher than the current's
*/
if (running) {
if (p->prio > oldprio)
resched_task(rq->curr);
} else
check_preempt_curr(rq, p);
}
/*
* We switched to the sched_fair class.
*/
static void switched_to_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
int running)
{
/*
* We were most likely switched from sched_rt, so
* kick off the schedule if running, otherwise just see
* if we can still preempt the current task.
*/
if (running)
resched_task(rq->curr);
else
check_preempt_curr(rq, p);
}
/* Account for a task changing its policy or group.
*
* This routine is mostly called to set cfs_rq->curr field when a task
......@@ -1318,6 +1354,9 @@ static const struct sched_class fair_sched_class = {
.set_curr_task = set_curr_task_fair,
.task_tick = task_tick_fair,
.task_new = task_new_fair,
.prio_changed = prio_changed_fair,
.switched_to = switched_to_fair,
};
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
......
......@@ -69,6 +69,33 @@ static void set_curr_task_idle(struct rq *rq)
{
}
static void switched_to_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
int running)
{
/* Can this actually happen?? */
if (running)
resched_task(rq->curr);
else
check_preempt_curr(rq, p);
}
static void prio_changed_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
int oldprio, int running)
{
/* This can happen for hot plug CPUS */
/*
* Reschedule if we are currently running on this runqueue and
* our priority decreased, or if we are not currently running on
* this runqueue and our priority is higher than the current's
*/
if (running) {
if (p->prio > oldprio)
resched_task(rq->curr);
} else
check_preempt_curr(rq, p);
}
/*
* Simple, special scheduling class for the per-CPU idle tasks:
*/
......@@ -94,5 +121,9 @@ const struct sched_class idle_sched_class = {
.set_curr_task = set_curr_task_idle,
.task_tick = task_tick_idle,
.prio_changed = prio_changed_idle,
.switched_to = switched_to_idle,
/* no .task_new for idle tasks */
};
......@@ -779,7 +779,92 @@ static void leave_domain_rt(struct rq *rq)
if (rq->rt.overloaded)
rt_clear_overload(rq);
}
/*
* When switch from the rt queue, we bring ourselves to a position
* that we might want to pull RT tasks from other runqueues.
*/
static void switched_from_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
int running)
{
/*
* If there are other RT tasks then we will reschedule
* and the scheduling of the other RT tasks will handle
* the balancing. But if we are the last RT task
* we may need to handle the pulling of RT tasks
* now.
*/
if (!rq->rt.rt_nr_running)
pull_rt_task(rq);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
/*
* When switching a task to RT, we may overload the runqueue
* with RT tasks. In this case we try to push them off to
* other runqueues.
*/
static void switched_to_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
int running)
{
int check_resched = 1;
/*
* If we are already running, then there's nothing
* that needs to be done. But if we are not running
* we may need to preempt the current running task.
* If that current running task is also an RT task
* then see if we can move to another run queue.
*/
if (!running) {
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (rq->rt.overloaded && push_rt_task(rq) &&
/* Don't resched if we changed runqueues */
rq != task_rq(p))
check_resched = 0;
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
if (check_resched && p->prio < rq->curr->prio)
resched_task(rq->curr);
}
}
/*
* Priority of the task has changed. This may cause
* us to initiate a push or pull.
*/
static void prio_changed_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
int oldprio, int running)
{
if (running) {
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* If our priority decreases while running, we
* may need to pull tasks to this runqueue.
*/
if (oldprio < p->prio)
pull_rt_task(rq);
/*
* If there's a higher priority task waiting to run
* then reschedule.
*/
if (p->prio > rq->rt.highest_prio)
resched_task(p);
#else
/* For UP simply resched on drop of prio */
if (oldprio < p->prio)
resched_task(p);
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
} else {
/*
* This task is not running, but if it is
* greater than the current running task
* then reschedule.
*/
if (p->prio < rq->curr->prio)
resched_task(rq->curr);
}
}
static void task_tick_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
......@@ -837,8 +922,12 @@ const struct sched_class rt_sched_class = {
.pre_schedule = pre_schedule_rt,
.post_schedule = post_schedule_rt,
.task_wake_up = task_wake_up_rt,
.switched_from = switched_from_rt,
#endif
.set_curr_task = set_curr_task_rt,
.task_tick = task_tick_rt,
.prio_changed = prio_changed_rt,
.switched_to = switched_to_rt,
};
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment