Commit c67fa027 authored by J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)'s avatar J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) Committed by David S. Miller

net/ipv4: correct RFC 1122 section reference in comment

RFC 1122 does not have a section 3.1.2.2. The requirement to silently
discard datagrams with a bad checksum is in section 3.2.1.2 instead.

Addresses http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10611Signed-off-by: default avatarJ.H.M. Dassen (Ray) <jdassen@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 62ab2227
...@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ int ip_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, struct packet_type *pt, ...@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ int ip_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, struct packet_type *pt,
iph = ip_hdr(skb); iph = ip_hdr(skb);
/* /*
* RFC1122: 3.1.2.2 MUST silently discard any IP frame that fails the checksum. * RFC1122: 3.2.1.2 MUST silently discard any IP frame that fails the checksum.
* *
* Is the datagram acceptable? * Is the datagram acceptable?
* *
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment