Commit c2372eb9 authored by Roland McGrath's avatar Roland McGrath Committed by Paul Mackerras

[POWERPC] user_regset PTRACE_SETREGS regression fix

The PTRACE_SETREGS request was only recently added on powerpc,
and gdb does not use it.  So it slipped through without getting
all the testing it should have had.

The user_regset changes had a simple bug in storing to all of
the 32-bit general registers block on 64-bit kernels.  This bug
only comes up with PTRACE_SETREGS, not PPC_PTRACE_SETREGS.
It causes a BUG_ON to hit, so this fix needs to go in ASAP.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRoland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
parent 264e3e88
......@@ -530,15 +530,21 @@ static int gpr32_set(struct task_struct *target,
--count;
}
if (kbuf)
if (kbuf) {
for (; count > 0 && pos <= PT_MAX_PUT_REG; --count)
regs[pos++] = *k++;
else
for (; count > 0 && pos < PT_TRAP; --count, ++pos)
++k;
} else {
for (; count > 0 && pos <= PT_MAX_PUT_REG; --count) {
if (__get_user(reg, u++))
return -EFAULT;
regs[pos++] = reg;
}
for (; count > 0 && pos < PT_TRAP; --count, ++pos)
if (__get_user(reg, u++))
return -EFAULT;
}
if (count > 0 && pos == PT_TRAP) {
if (kbuf)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment