ext4: lock block groups when initializing

I noticed when filling a 1T filesystem with 4 threads using the
fs_mark benchmark:

fs_mark -d /mnt/test -D 256 -n 100000 -t 4 -s 20480 -F -S 0

that I occasionally got checksum mismatch errors:

EXT4-fs error (device sdb): ext4_init_inode_bitmap: Checksum bad for group 6935

etc.  I'd reliably get 4-5 of them during the run.

It appears that the problem is likely a race to init the bg's
when the uninit_bg feature is enabled.

With the patch below, which adds sb_bgl_locking around initialization,
I was able to complete several runs with no errors or warnings.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

fs/ext4/balloc.c

@@ -321,12 +321,15 @@ ext4_read_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group)
 	if (bh_uptodate_or_lock(bh))
 		return bh;
 
+	spin_lock(sb_bgl_lock(EXT4_SB(sb), block_group));
 	if (desc->bg_flags & cpu_to_le16(EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT)) {
 		ext4_init_block_bitmap(sb, bh, block_group, desc);
 		set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
 		unlock_buffer(bh);
+		spin_unlock(sb_bgl_lock(EXT4_SB(sb), block_group));
 		return bh;
 	}
+	spin_unlock(sb_bgl_lock(EXT4_SB(sb), block_group));
 	if (bh_submit_read(bh) < 0) {
 		put_bh(bh);
 		ext4_error(sb, __func__,

fs/ext4/ialloc.c

@@ -118,12 +118,15 @@ ext4_read_inode_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group)
 	if (bh_uptodate_or_lock(bh))
 		return bh;
 
+	spin_lock(sb_bgl_lock(EXT4_SB(sb), block_group));
 	if (desc->bg_flags & cpu_to_le16(EXT4_BG_INODE_UNINIT)) {
 		ext4_init_inode_bitmap(sb, bh, block_group, desc);
 		set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
 		unlock_buffer(bh);
+		spin_unlock(sb_bgl_lock(EXT4_SB(sb), block_group));
 		return bh;
 	}
+	spin_unlock(sb_bgl_lock(EXT4_SB(sb), block_group));
 	if (bh_submit_read(bh) < 0) {
 		put_bh(bh);
 		ext4_error(sb, __func__,
@@ -735,7 +738,7 @@ got:
 
 			/* When marking the block group with
 			 * ~EXT4_BG_INODE_UNINIT we don't want to depend
-			 * on the value of bg_itable_unsed even though
+			 * on the value of bg_itable_unused even though
 			 * mke2fs could have initialized the same for us.
 			 * Instead we calculated the value below
 			 */

fs/ext4/mballoc.c

@@ -787,13 +787,16 @@ static int ext4_mb_init_cache(struct page *page, char *incore)
 		if (bh_uptodate_or_lock(bh[i]))
 			continue;
 
+		spin_lock(sb_bgl_lock(EXT4_SB(sb), first_group + i));
 		if (desc->bg_flags & cpu_to_le16(EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT)) {
 			ext4_init_block_bitmap(sb, bh[i],
 						first_group + i, desc);
 			set_buffer_uptodate(bh[i]);
 			unlock_buffer(bh[i]);
+			spin_unlock(sb_bgl_lock(EXT4_SB(sb), first_group + i));
 			continue;
 		}
+		spin_unlock(sb_bgl_lock(EXT4_SB(sb), first_group + i));
 		get_bh(bh[i]);
 		bh[i]->b_end_io = end_buffer_read_sync;
 		submit_bh(READ, bh[i]);

fs/ext4/super.c

@@ -1621,6 +1621,7 @@ static int ext4_check_descriptors(struct super_block *sb)
 			       "(block %llu)!", i, inode_table);
 			return 0;
 		}
+		spin_lock(sb_bgl_lock(sbi, i));
 		if (!ext4_group_desc_csum_verify(sbi, i, gdp)) {
 			printk(KERN_ERR "EXT4-fs: ext4_check_descriptors: "
 			       "Checksum for group %lu failed (%u!=%u)\n",
@@ -1629,6 +1630,7 @@ static int ext4_check_descriptors(struct super_block *sb)
 			if (!(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY))
 				return 0;
 		}
+		spin_unlock(sb_bgl_lock(sbi, i));
 		if (!flexbg_flag)
 			first_block += EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb);
 	}