x86: Interleave emulated nodes over physical nodes
Add interleaved NUMA emulation support This patch interleaves emulated nodes over the system's physical nodes. This is required for interleave optimizations since mempolicies, for example, operate by iterating over a nodemask and act without knowledge of node distances. It can also be used for testing memory latencies and NUMA bugs in the kernel. There're a couple of ways to do this: - divide the number of emulated nodes by the number of physical nodes and allocate the result on each physical node, or - allocate each successive emulated node on a different physical node until all memory is exhausted. The disadvantage of the first option is, depending on the asymmetry in node capacities of each physical node, emulated nodes may substantially differ in size on a particular physical node compared to another. The disadvantage of the second option is, also depending on the asymmetry in node capacities of each physical node, there may be more emulated nodes allocated on a single physical node as another. This patch implements the second option; we sacrifice the possibility that we may have slightly more emulated nodes on a particular physical node compared to another in lieu of node size asymmetry. [ Note that "node capacity" of a physical node is not only a function of its addressable range, but also is affected by subtracting out the amount of reserved memory over that range. NUMA emulation only deals with available, non-reserved memory quantities. ] We ensure there is at least a minimal amount of available memory allocated to each node. We also make sure that at least this amount of available memory is available in ZONE_DMA32 for any node that includes both ZONE_DMA32 and ZONE_NORMAL. This patch also cleans the emulation code up by no longer passing the statically allocated struct bootnode array among the various functions. This init.data array is not allocated on the stack since it may be very large and thus it may be accessed at file scope. The WARN_ON() for nodes_cover_memory() when faking proximity domains is removed since it relies on successive nodes always having greater start addresses than previous nodes; with interleaving this is no longer always true. Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Ankita Garg <ankita@in.ibm.com> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0909251519150.14754@chino.kir.corp.google.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment