Commit ab941e0f authored by Naoya Horiguchi's avatar Naoya Horiguchi Committed by Linus Torvalds

rmap: remove anon_vma check in page_address_in_vma()

Currently page_address_in_vma() compares vma->anon_vma and
page_anon_vma(page) for parameter check, but in 2.6.34 a vma can have
multiple anon_vmas with anon_vma_chain, so current check does not work.
(For anonymous page shared by multiple processes, some verified (page,vma)
pairs return -EFAULT wrongly.)

We can go to checking all anon_vmas in the "same_vma" chain, but it needs
to meet lock requirement.  Instead, we can remove anon_vma check safely
because page_address_in_vma() assumes that page and vma are already
checked to belong to the identical process.
Signed-off-by: default avatarNaoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 4a6018f7
......@@ -336,14 +336,13 @@ vma_address(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
/*
* At what user virtual address is page expected in vma?
* checking that the page matches the vma.
* Caller should check the page is actually part of the vma.
*/
unsigned long page_address_in_vma(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
if (PageAnon(page)) {
if (vma->anon_vma != page_anon_vma(page))
return -EFAULT;
} else if (page->mapping && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_NONLINEAR)) {
if (PageAnon(page))
;
else if (page->mapping && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_NONLINEAR)) {
if (!vma->vm_file ||
vma->vm_file->f_mapping != page->mapping)
return -EFAULT;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment