Commit 8f8e05c5 authored by J.Bruce Fields's avatar J.Bruce Fields Committed by Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] knfsd: svcrpc: use consistent variable name for the reply state

The rpc reply has multiple levels of error returns.  The code here contributes
to the confusion by using "accept_statp" for a pointer to what the rfc (and
wireshark, etc.) refer to as the "reply_stat".  (The confusion is compounded
by the fact that the rfc also has an "accept_stat" which follows the
reply_stat in the succesful case.)
Signed-off-by: default avatarJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
parent 5b304bc5
......@@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ svc_process(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
u32 dir, prog, vers, proc;
__be32 auth_stat, rpc_stat;
int auth_res;
__be32 *accept_statp;
__be32 *reply_statp;
rpc_stat = rpc_success;
......@@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ svc_process(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
goto err_bad_rpc;
/* Save position in case we later decide to reject: */
accept_statp = resv->iov_base + resv->iov_len;
reply_statp = resv->iov_base + resv->iov_len;
svc_putnl(resv, 0); /* ACCEPT */
......@@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ err_bad_auth:
dprintk("svc: authentication failed (%d)\n", ntohl(auth_stat));
serv->sv_stats->rpcbadauth++;
/* Restore write pointer to location of accept status: */
xdr_ressize_check(rqstp, accept_statp);
xdr_ressize_check(rqstp, reply_statp);
svc_putnl(resv, 1); /* REJECT */
svc_putnl(resv, 1); /* AUTH_ERROR */
svc_putnl(resv, ntohl(auth_stat)); /* status */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment