Commit 8b124a8e authored by Don Skidmore's avatar Don Skidmore Committed by David S. Miller

net: fix dcbnl_setnumtcs operation check

dcbml_setnumtcs wasn't checking for the presence of the setnumtcs
function.  Instead, it was checking for setstate which was a bug.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDon Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric W Multanen <eric.w.multanen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 5ecc3614
...@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ static int dcbnl_setnumtcs(struct net_device *netdev, struct nlattr **tb, ...@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ static int dcbnl_setnumtcs(struct net_device *netdev, struct nlattr **tb,
u8 value; u8 value;
int i; int i;
if (!tb[DCB_ATTR_NUMTCS] || !netdev->dcbnl_ops->setstate) if (!tb[DCB_ATTR_NUMTCS] || !netdev->dcbnl_ops->setnumtcs)
return ret; return ret;
ret = nla_parse_nested(data, DCB_NUMTCS_ATTR_MAX, tb[DCB_ATTR_NUMTCS], ret = nla_parse_nested(data, DCB_NUMTCS_ATTR_MAX, tb[DCB_ATTR_NUMTCS],
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment