Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in
Toggle navigation
L
linux-davinci
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Redmine
Redmine
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Operations
Operations
Metrics
Environments
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
linux
linux-davinci
Commits
88d535b6
Commit
88d535b6
authored
Mar 02, 2005
by
Ralf Baechle
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
One definition of back_to_back_c0_hazard too much.
Signed-off-by:
Ralf Baechle
<
ralf@linux-mips.org
>
parent
fe00f943
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
1 addition
and
6 deletions
+1
-6
include/asm-mips/hazards.h
include/asm-mips/hazards.h
+1
-6
No files found.
include/asm-mips/hazards.h
View file @
88d535b6
...
...
@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ __asm__(
" .endm
\n\t
"
);
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_RM9000
/*
* RM9000 hazards. When the JTLB is updated by tlbwi or tlbwr, a subsequent
* use of the JTLB for instructions should not occur for 4 cpu cycles and use
...
...
@@ -144,12 +145,6 @@ __asm__(
"nop; nop; nop; nop; nop; nop;\n\t" \
".set reorder\n\t")
#define back_to_back_c0_hazard() \
__asm__ __volatile__( \
" .set noreorder \n" \
" nop; nop; nop \n" \
" .set reorder \n")
#endif
/*
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment