Commit 8082510e authored by Yan, Zheng's avatar Yan, Zheng Committed by Chris Mason

Btrfs: Make truncate(2) more ENOSPC friendly

truncating and deleting regular files are unbound operations,
so it's not good to do them in a single transaction. This
patch makes btrfs_truncate and btrfs_delete_inode start a
new transaction after all items in a tree leaf are deleted.
Signed-off-by: default avatarYan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
parent 5a303d5d
This diff is collapsed.
......@@ -1561,6 +1561,20 @@ static int invalidate_extent_cache(struct btrfs_root *root,
return 0;
}
static void put_inodes(struct list_head *list)
{
struct inodevec *ivec;
while (!list_empty(list)) {
ivec = list_entry(list->next, struct inodevec, list);
list_del(&ivec->list);
while (ivec->nr > 0) {
ivec->nr--;
iput(ivec->inode[ivec->nr]);
}
kfree(ivec);
}
}
static int find_next_key(struct btrfs_path *path, int level,
struct btrfs_key *key)
......@@ -1723,6 +1737,11 @@ static noinline_for_stack int merge_reloc_root(struct reloc_control *rc,
btrfs_btree_balance_dirty(root, nr);
/*
* put inodes outside transaction, otherwise we may deadlock.
*/
put_inodes(&inode_list);
if (replaced && rc->stage == UPDATE_DATA_PTRS)
invalidate_extent_cache(root, &key, &next_key);
}
......@@ -1752,19 +1771,7 @@ out:
btrfs_btree_balance_dirty(root, nr);
/*
* put inodes while we aren't holding the tree locks
*/
while (!list_empty(&inode_list)) {
struct inodevec *ivec;
ivec = list_entry(inode_list.next, struct inodevec, list);
list_del(&ivec->list);
while (ivec->nr > 0) {
ivec->nr--;
iput(ivec->inode[ivec->nr]);
}
kfree(ivec);
}
put_inodes(&inode_list);
if (replaced && rc->stage == UPDATE_DATA_PTRS)
invalidate_extent_cache(root, &key, &next_key);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment