Commit 7e90b749 authored by Masato Noguchi's avatar Masato Noguchi Committed by Arnd Bergmann

[CELL] spufs: use find_first_bit() instead of sched_find_first_bit()

spu_sched->bitmap has MAX_PRIO(=140) width in bits.However, since
ff80a77f, sched_find_first_bit()
only supports 100-bit bitmaps.

Thus, spu_sched->bitmap should be treated by generic find_first_bit().
Signed-off-by: default avatarMasato Noguchi <Masato.Noguchi@jp.sony.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarArnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@de.ibm.com>
parent 50af32a9
...@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ static struct spu_context *grab_runnable_context(int prio, int node) ...@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ static struct spu_context *grab_runnable_context(int prio, int node)
int best; int best;
spin_lock(&spu_prio->runq_lock); spin_lock(&spu_prio->runq_lock);
best = sched_find_first_bit(spu_prio->bitmap); best = find_first_bit(spu_prio->bitmap, prio);
while (best < prio) { while (best < prio) {
struct list_head *rq = &spu_prio->runq[best]; struct list_head *rq = &spu_prio->runq[best];
...@@ -738,7 +738,6 @@ int __init spu_sched_init(void) ...@@ -738,7 +738,6 @@ int __init spu_sched_init(void)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&spu_prio->runq[i]); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&spu_prio->runq[i]);
__clear_bit(i, spu_prio->bitmap); __clear_bit(i, spu_prio->bitmap);
} }
__set_bit(MAX_PRIO, spu_prio->bitmap);
for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUMNODES; i++) { for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUMNODES; i++) {
mutex_init(&spu_prio->active_mutex[i]); mutex_init(&spu_prio->active_mutex[i]);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&spu_prio->active_list[i]); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&spu_prio->active_list[i]);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment