Commit 7a0b73a4 authored by Luck, Tony's avatar Luck, Tony Committed by Len Brown

ACPI: Fix section mismatch error for acpi_early_processor_set_pdc()

Alex Chiang introduced acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() in commit:
 ACPI: processor: call _PDC early
 78f16996

But this results in a section mismatch:

WARNING: drivers/acpi/acpi.o(.text+0xa9c1): Section mismatch in reference from the
function acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() to the variable .cpuinit.data:processor_idle_dmi_table
The function acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() references
the variable __cpuinitdata processor_idle_dmi_table.
This is often because acpi_early_processor_set_pdc lacks a __cpuinitdata
annotation or the annotation of processor_idle_dmi_table is wrong.

The only caller of acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() is acpi_bus_init() which
is an "__init" function. So the correct fix here is to mark
acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() "__init" too.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Acked-by: default avatarAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
parent 070a24f4
...@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ early_init_pdc(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv) ...@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ early_init_pdc(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
return AE_OK; return AE_OK;
} }
void acpi_early_processor_set_pdc(void) void __init acpi_early_processor_set_pdc(void)
{ {
/* /*
* Check whether the system is DMI table. If yes, OSPM * Check whether the system is DMI table. If yes, OSPM
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment