Commit 6e65acba authored by Oleg Nesterov's avatar Oleg Nesterov Committed by Linus Torvalds

signals: move handle_stop_signal() into send_signal()

Move handle_stop_signal() into send_signal().  This factors out a couple of
callsites and allows us to do further unifications.

Also, with this change specific_send_sig_info() does handle_stop_signal().
Not that this is really important, we never send STOP/CONT via send_sig() and
friends, but still this looks more consistent.

The only (afaics) special case is get_signal_to_deliver().  If the traced task
dequeues SIGCONT, it can re-send it to itself after ptrace_stop() if the
signal was blocked by debugger.  In that case handle_stop_signal() is
unnecessary, but hopefully not a problem.
Signed-off-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent c99fcf28
...@@ -660,8 +660,10 @@ static inline int legacy_queue(struct sigpending *signals, int sig) ...@@ -660,8 +660,10 @@ static inline int legacy_queue(struct sigpending *signals, int sig)
static int send_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t, static int send_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t,
struct sigpending *signals) struct sigpending *signals)
{ {
struct sigqueue * q = NULL; struct sigqueue *q;
assert_spin_locked(&t->sighand->siglock);
handle_stop_signal(sig, t);
/* /*
* Short-circuit ignored signals and support queuing * Short-circuit ignored signals and support queuing
* exactly one non-rt signal, so that we can get more * exactly one non-rt signal, so that we can get more
...@@ -766,9 +768,6 @@ specific_send_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t) ...@@ -766,9 +768,6 @@ specific_send_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t)
{ {
int ret; int ret;
BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
assert_spin_locked(&t->sighand->siglock);
ret = send_signal(sig, info, t, &t->pending); ret = send_signal(sig, info, t, &t->pending);
if (ret <= 0) if (ret <= 0)
return ret; return ret;
...@@ -923,9 +922,6 @@ __group_send_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *p) ...@@ -923,9 +922,6 @@ __group_send_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *p)
{ {
int ret; int ret;
assert_spin_locked(&p->sighand->siglock);
handle_stop_signal(sig, p);
/* /*
* Put this signal on the shared-pending queue, or fail with EAGAIN. * Put this signal on the shared-pending queue, or fail with EAGAIN.
* We always use the shared queue for process-wide signals, * We always use the shared queue for process-wide signals,
...@@ -2241,7 +2237,6 @@ static int do_tkill(int tgid, int pid, int sig) ...@@ -2241,7 +2237,6 @@ static int do_tkill(int tgid, int pid, int sig)
*/ */
if (!error && sig && p->sighand) { if (!error && sig && p->sighand) {
spin_lock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock); spin_lock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
handle_stop_signal(sig, p);
error = specific_send_sig_info(sig, &info, p); error = specific_send_sig_info(sig, &info, p);
spin_unlock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock); spin_unlock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment