Commit 5d707e9c authored by Tejun Heo's avatar Tejun Heo Committed by Ingo Molnar

stackprotector: update make rules

Impact: no default -fno-stack-protector if stackp is enabled, cleanup

Stackprotector make rules had the following problems.

* cc support test and warning are scattered across makefile and
  kernel/panic.c.

* -fno-stack-protector was always added regardless of configuration.

Update such that cc support test and warning are contained in makefile
and -fno-stack-protector is added iff stackp is turned off.  While at
it, prepare for 32bit support.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 76397f72
...@@ -532,8 +532,9 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-Wframe-larger-than=${CONFIG_FRAME_WARN}) ...@@ -532,8 +532,9 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-Wframe-larger-than=${CONFIG_FRAME_WARN})
endif endif
# Force gcc to behave correct even for buggy distributions # Force gcc to behave correct even for buggy distributions
# Arch Makefiles may override this setting ifndef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector) KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
endif
ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls
......
...@@ -70,14 +70,17 @@ else ...@@ -70,14 +70,17 @@ else
# this works around some issues with generating unwind tables in older gccs # this works around some issues with generating unwind tables in older gccs
# newer gccs do it by default # newer gccs do it by default
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -maccumulate-outgoing-args KBUILD_CFLAGS += -maccumulate-outgoing-args
endif
stackp := $(CONFIG_SHELL) $(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh ifdef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
stackp-$(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR) := $(shell $(stackp) \ cc_has_sp := $(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_$(BITS)-has-stack-protector.sh
"$(CC)" "-fstack-protector -DGCC_HAS_SP" ) ifeq ($(shell $(CONFIG_SHELL) $(cc_has_sp) $(CC)),y)
stackp-$(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL) += $(shell $(stackp) \ stackp-y := -fstack-protector
"$(CC)" -fstack-protector-all ) stackp-$(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL) += -fstack-protector-all
KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(stackp-y)
KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(stackp-y) else
$(warning stack protector enabled but no compiler support)
endif
endif endif
# Stackpointer is addressed different for 32 bit and 64 bit x86 # Stackpointer is addressed different for 32 bit and 64 bit x86
......
...@@ -359,10 +359,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(warn_slowpath); ...@@ -359,10 +359,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(warn_slowpath);
#ifdef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR #ifdef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
#ifndef GCC_HAS_SP
#warning You have selected the CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR option, but the gcc used does not support this.
#endif
/* /*
* Called when gcc's -fstack-protector feature is used, and * Called when gcc's -fstack-protector feature is used, and
* gcc detects corruption of the on-stack canary value * gcc detects corruption of the on-stack canary value
......
...@@ -2,5 +2,7 @@ ...@@ -2,5 +2,7 @@
echo "int foo(void) { char X[200]; return 3; }" | $1 -S -xc -c -O0 -mcmodel=kernel -fstack-protector - -o - 2> /dev/null | grep -q "%gs" echo "int foo(void) { char X[200]; return 3; }" | $1 -S -xc -c -O0 -mcmodel=kernel -fstack-protector - -o - 2> /dev/null | grep -q "%gs"
if [ "$?" -eq "0" ] ; then if [ "$?" -eq "0" ] ; then
echo $2 echo y
else
echo n
fi fi
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment