Commit 5c99cbf4 authored by Oleg Nesterov's avatar Oleg Nesterov Committed by Linus Torvalds

coredump: set ->group_exit_code for other CLONE_VM tasks too

User visible change.

do_coredump() kills all threads which share the same ->mm but only the
coredumping process gets the proper exit_code.  Other tasks which share
the same ->mm die "silently" and return status == 0 to parent.

This is historical behaviour, not actually a bug.  But I think Frank
Heckenbach rightly dislikes the current behaviour.  Simple test-case:

	#include <stdio.h>
	#include <unistd.h>
	#include <signal.h>
	#include <sys/wait.h>

	int main(void)
	{
		int stat;

		if (!fork()) {
			if (!vfork())
				kill(getpid(), SIGQUIT);
		}

		wait(&stat);
		printf("stat=%x\n", stat);
		return 0;
	}

Before this patch it prints "stat=0" despite the fact the child was killed
by SIGQUIT.  After this patch the output is "stat=3" which obviously makes
more sense.

Even with this patch, only the task which originates the coredumping gets
"|= 0x80" if the core was actually dumped, but at least the coredumping
signal is visible to do_wait/etc.
Reported-by: default avatarFrank Heckenbach <f.heckenbach@fh-soft.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarWANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 30736a4d
......@@ -1561,12 +1561,13 @@ out:
return ispipe;
}
static int zap_process(struct task_struct *start)
static int zap_process(struct task_struct *start, int exit_code)
{
struct task_struct *t;
int nr = 0;
start->signal->flags = SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT;
start->signal->group_exit_code = exit_code;
start->signal->group_stop_count = 0;
t = start;
......@@ -1591,8 +1592,7 @@ static inline int zap_threads(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
spin_lock_irq(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
if (!signal_group_exit(tsk->signal)) {
mm->core_state = core_state;
tsk->signal->group_exit_code = exit_code;
nr = zap_process(tsk);
nr = zap_process(tsk, exit_code);
}
spin_unlock_irq(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
if (unlikely(nr < 0))
......@@ -1641,7 +1641,7 @@ static inline int zap_threads(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
if (p->mm) {
if (unlikely(p->mm == mm)) {
lock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
nr += zap_process(p);
nr += zap_process(p, exit_code);
unlock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
}
break;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment