Commit 5c548226 authored by Ohad Ben-Cohen's avatar Ohad Ben-Cohen Committed by David S. Miller

[BLUETOOTH]: Always send explicit hci_ll wake-up acks.

In the (rare) event of simultaneous mutual wake up requests,
do send the chip an explicit wake-up ack. This is required
for Texas Instruments's BRF6350 chip.
Signed-off-by: default avatarOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@bencohen.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent f951375d
......@@ -204,6 +204,19 @@ static void ll_device_want_to_wakeup(struct hci_uart *hu)
spin_lock_irqsave(&ll->hcill_lock, flags);
switch (ll->hcill_state) {
case HCILL_ASLEEP_TO_AWAKE:
/*
* This state means that both the host and the BRF chip
* have simultaneously sent a wake-up-indication packet.
* Traditionaly, in this case, receiving a wake-up-indication
* was enough and an additional wake-up-ack wasn't needed.
* This has changed with the BRF6350, which does require an
* explicit wake-up-ack. Other BRF versions, which do not
* require an explicit ack here, do accept it, thus it is
* perfectly safe to always send one.
*/
BT_DBG("dual wake-up-indication");
/* deliberate fall-through - do not add break */
case HCILL_ASLEEP:
/* acknowledge device wake up */
if (send_hcill_cmd(HCILL_WAKE_UP_ACK, hu) < 0) {
......@@ -211,16 +224,8 @@ static void ll_device_want_to_wakeup(struct hci_uart *hu)
goto out;
}
break;
case HCILL_ASLEEP_TO_AWAKE:
/*
* this state means that a wake-up-indication
* is already on its way to the device,
* and will serve as the required wake-up-ack
*/
BT_DBG("dual wake-up-indication");
break;
default:
/* any other state are illegal */
/* any other state is illegal */
BT_ERR("received HCILL_WAKE_UP_IND in state %ld", ll->hcill_state);
break;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment