Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in
Toggle navigation
L
linux-davinci
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Redmine
Redmine
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Operations
Operations
Metrics
Environments
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
linux
linux-davinci
Commits
43b2a33a
Commit
43b2a33a
authored
Nov 04, 2005
by
Trond Myklebust
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
NFSv4: Fix recovery of flock() locks.
Signed-off-by:
Trond Myklebust
<
Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com
>
parent
34ea8188
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
2 additions
and
2 deletions
+2
-2
fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
+2
-2
No files found.
fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
View file @
43b2a33a
...
...
@@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ static int nfs4_reclaim_locks(struct nfs4_state_recovery_ops *ops, struct nfs4_s
int
status
=
0
;
for
(
fl
=
inode
->
i_flock
;
fl
!=
0
;
fl
=
fl
->
fl_next
)
{
if
(
!
(
fl
->
fl_flags
&
FL_POSIX
))
if
(
!
(
fl
->
fl_flags
&
(
FL_POSIX
|
FL_FLOCK
)
))
continue
;
if
(((
struct
nfs_open_context
*
)
fl
->
fl_file
->
private_data
)
->
state
!=
state
)
continue
;
...
...
@@ -799,7 +799,7 @@ static int nfs4_reclaim_locks(struct nfs4_state_recovery_ops *ops, struct nfs4_s
case
-
NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE
:
case
-
NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_BAD
:
case
-
NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_CONFLICT
:
/* kill_proc(fl->fl_
owner
, SIGLOST, 1); */
/* kill_proc(fl->fl_
pid
, SIGLOST, 1); */
break
;
case
-
NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID
:
goto
out_err
;
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment