Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in
Toggle navigation
L
linux-davinci
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Redmine
Redmine
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Operations
Operations
Metrics
Environments
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
linux
linux-davinci
Commits
37e4c13b
Commit
37e4c13b
authored
Feb 18, 2005
by
Anton Altaparmakov
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
NTFS: Fix a nasty runlist merge bug when merging two holes.
Signed-off-by:
Anton Altaparmakov
<
aia21@cantab.net
>
parent
d8ec785e
Changes
2
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
with
6 additions
and
2 deletions
+6
-2
fs/ntfs/ChangeLog
fs/ntfs/ChangeLog
+2
-1
fs/ntfs/runlist.c
fs/ntfs/runlist.c
+4
-1
No files found.
fs/ntfs/ChangeLog
View file @
37e4c13b
...
...
@@ -72,9 +72,10 @@ ToDo/Notes:
runlist. This allows us to find runlist elements with the runlist
lock already held without having to drop and reacquire it around the
call. Adapt all callers.
- Change time to u64 time.h::ntfs2utc() as it otherwise generates a
- Change time to u64
in
time.h::ntfs2utc() as it otherwise generates a
warning in the do_div() call on sparc32. Thanks to Meelis Roos for
the report and analysis of the warning.
- Fix a nasty runlist merge bug when merging two holes.
2.1.22 - Many bug and race fixes and error handling improvements.
...
...
fs/ntfs/runlist.c
View file @
37e4c13b
...
...
@@ -113,8 +113,11 @@ static inline BOOL ntfs_are_rl_mergeable(runlist_element *dst,
BUG_ON
(
!
dst
);
BUG_ON
(
!
src
);
if
((
dst
->
lcn
<
0
)
||
(
src
->
lcn
<
0
))
/* Are we merging holes? */
if
((
dst
->
lcn
<
0
)
||
(
src
->
lcn
<
0
))
{
/* Are we merging holes? */
if
(
dst
->
lcn
==
LCN_HOLE
&&
src
->
lcn
==
LCN_HOLE
)
return
TRUE
;
return
FALSE
;
}
if
((
dst
->
lcn
+
dst
->
length
)
!=
src
->
lcn
)
/* Are the runs contiguous? */
return
FALSE
;
if
((
dst
->
vcn
+
dst
->
length
)
!=
src
->
vcn
)
/* Are the runs misaligned? */
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment