Commit 2d429c89 authored by David P. Reed's avatar David P. Reed Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

ntp: fix typo that makes sync_cmos_clock erratic

patch fa6a1a55 in mainline.

ntp: fix typo that makes sync_cmos_clock erratic

Fix a typo in ntp.c that has caused updating of the persistent (RTC)
clock when synced to NTP to behave erratically.

When debugging a freeze that arises on my AMD64 machines when I
run the ntpd service, I added a number of printk's to monitor the
sync_cmos_clock procedure.  I discovered that it was not syncing to
cmos RTC every 11 minutes as documented, but instead would keep trying
every second for hours at a time.  The reason turned out to be a typo
in sync_cmos_clock, where it attempts to ensure that
update_persistent_clock is called very close to 500 msec. after a 1
second boundary (required by the PC RTC's spec). That typo referred to
"xtime" in one spot, rather than "now", which is derived from "xtime"
but not equal to it.  This makes the test erratic, creating a
"coin-flip" that decides when update_persistent_clock is called - when
it is called, which is rarely, it may be at any time during the one
second period, rather than close to 500 msec, so the value written is
needlessly incorrect, too.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid P. Reed <dpreed@reed.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
parent 26b880d6
...@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static void sync_cmos_clock(unsigned long dummy) ...@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static void sync_cmos_clock(unsigned long dummy)
return; return;
getnstimeofday(&now); getnstimeofday(&now);
if (abs(xtime.tv_nsec - (NSEC_PER_SEC / 2)) <= tick_nsec / 2) if (abs(now.tv_nsec - (NSEC_PER_SEC / 2)) <= tick_nsec / 2)
fail = update_persistent_clock(now); fail = update_persistent_clock(now);
next.tv_nsec = (NSEC_PER_SEC / 2) - now.tv_nsec; next.tv_nsec = (NSEC_PER_SEC / 2) - now.tv_nsec;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment