Commit 216d81bb authored by Domen Puncer's avatar Domen Puncer Committed by Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] janitor: jffs/intrep: list_for_each_entry

Use list_for_each_entry to make code more readable.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMaximilian Attems <janitor@sternwelten.at>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDomen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
Cc: <jffs-dev@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
parent 81616c5a
......@@ -1701,12 +1701,10 @@ jffs_find_file(struct jffs_control *c, __u32 ino)
{
struct jffs_file *f;
int i = ino % c->hash_len;
struct list_head *tmp;
D3(printk("jffs_find_file(): ino: %u\n", ino));
for (tmp = c->hash[i].next; tmp != &c->hash[i]; tmp = tmp->next) {
f = list_entry(tmp, struct jffs_file, hash);
list_for_each_entry(f, &c->hash[i], hash) {
if (ino != f->ino)
continue;
D3(printk("jffs_find_file(): Found file with ino "
......@@ -2102,13 +2100,12 @@ jffs_foreach_file(struct jffs_control *c, int (*func)(struct jffs_file *))
int result = 0;
for (pos = 0; pos < c->hash_len; pos++) {
struct list_head *p, *next;
for (p = c->hash[pos].next; p != &c->hash[pos]; p = next) {
/* We need a reference to the next file in the
list because `func' might remove the current
file `f'. */
next = p->next;
r = func(list_entry(p, struct jffs_file, hash));
struct jffs_file *f, *next;
/* We must do _safe, because 'func' might remove the
current file 'f' from the list. */
list_for_each_entry_safe(f, next, &c->hash[pos], hash) {
r = func(f);
if (r < 0)
return r;
result += r;
......@@ -2613,9 +2610,8 @@ jffs_print_hash_table(struct jffs_control *c)
printk("JFFS: Dumping the file system's hash table...\n");
for (i = 0; i < c->hash_len; i++) {
struct list_head *p;
for (p = c->hash[i].next; p != &c->hash[i]; p = p->next) {
struct jffs_file *f=list_entry(p,struct jffs_file,hash);
struct jffs_file *f;
list_for_each_entry(f, &c->hash[i], hash) {
printk("*** c->hash[%u]: \"%s\" "
"(ino: %u, pino: %u)\n",
i, (f->name ? f->name : ""),
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment