Commit 188c18fd authored by NeilBrown's avatar NeilBrown Committed by Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] md: make sure the new 'sb_size' is set properly device added without...

[PATCH] md: make sure the new 'sb_size' is set properly device added without pre-existing superblock.

There are two ways to add devices to an md/raid array.

  It can have superblock written to it, and then given to the md driver,
  which will read the superblock (the new way)

or

  md can be told (through SET_ARRAY_INFO) the shape of the array, and
  the told about individual drives, and md will create the required
  superblock (the old way).

The newly introduced sb_size was only set for drives being added the
new way, not the old ways.  Oops :-(
Signed-off-by: default avatarNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
parent b325a32e
...@@ -2303,6 +2303,8 @@ static int add_new_disk(mddev_t * mddev, mdu_disk_info_t *info) ...@@ -2303,6 +2303,8 @@ static int add_new_disk(mddev_t * mddev, mdu_disk_info_t *info)
else else
rdev->in_sync = 0; rdev->in_sync = 0;
rdev->sb_size = MD_SB_BYTES;
if (info->state & (1<<MD_DISK_WRITEMOSTLY)) if (info->state & (1<<MD_DISK_WRITEMOSTLY))
set_bit(WriteMostly, &rdev->flags); set_bit(WriteMostly, &rdev->flags);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment