-
Herbert Xu authored
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 10:24:32PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > [<c04de9e8>] _write_lock+0x8/0x10 > [<c0499015>] inet6_destroy_sock+0x25/0x100 > [<c04b8672>] tcp_v6_destroy_sock+0x12/0x20 > [<c046bbda>] inet_csk_destroy_sock+0x4a/0x150 > [<c047625c>] tcp_rcv_state_process+0xd4c/0xdd0 > [<c047d8e9>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xa9/0x340 > [<c047eabb>] tcp_v4_rcv+0x8eb/0x9d0 OK this is definitely broken. We should never touch the dst lock in softirq context. Since inet6_destroy_sock may be called from that context due to the asynchronous nature of sockets, we can't take the lock there. In fact this sk_dst_reset is totally redundant since all IPv6 sockets use inet_sock_destruct as their socket destructor which always cleans up the dst anyway. So the solution is to simply remove the call. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
6f4b6ec1