-
Peter Zijlstra authored
Andrew Morton wrote: > I've been seeing the below for a long time during suspend-to-ram on the Vaio. > > > PM: Syncing filesystems ... done. > PM: Preparing system for mem sleep > Freezing user space processes ... <4>------------[ cut here ]------------ > WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2658 check_flags+0x4c/0x127() > Modules linked in: i915 drm ipw2200 sonypi ipv6 autofs4 hidp l2cap bluetooth sunrpc nf_conntrack_netbios_ns ipt_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv4 xt_state nf_conntrack xt_tcpudp iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables acpi_cpufreq nvram ohci1394 ieee1394 ehci_hcd uhci_hcd sg joydev snd_hda_intel snd_seq_dummy sr_mod snd_seq_oss cdrom snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss ieee80211 pcspkr ieee80211_crypt snd_pcm i2c_i801 snd_timer i2c_core ide_pci_generic piix snd soundcore snd_page_alloc button ext3 jbd ide_disk ide_core [last unloaded: ipw2200] > Pid: 3250, comm: zsh Not tainted 2.6.26-rc5 #1 > [<c011c5f5>] warn_on_slowpath+0x41/0x6d > [<c01080e6>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 > [<c013789c>] ? mark_held_locks+0x41/0x5c > [<c0315688>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x36/0x58 > [<c0137a29>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xe6/0x10d > [<c0138637>] ? __lock_acquire+0xae3/0xb2b > [<c0313413>] ? schedule+0x39b/0x3b4 > [<c0135596>] check_flags+0x4c/0x127 > [<c01386b9>] lock_acquire+0x3a/0x86 > [<c0315075>] _spin_lock+0x26/0x53 > [<c0140660>] ? refrigerator+0x13/0xc3 > [<c0140660>] refrigerator+0x13/0xc3 > [<c012684a>] get_signal_to_deliver+0x3c/0x31e > [<c0102fe7>] do_notify_resume+0x91/0x6ee > [<c01359fd>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0x50/0x56 > [<c0315688>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x36/0x58 > [<c0235d24>] ? read_chan+0x0/0x58c > [<c0137a29>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xe6/0x10d > [<c0315694>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x42/0x58 > [<c0230afa>] ? tty_ldisc_deref+0x5c/0x63 > [<c0233104>] ? tty_read+0x66/0x98 > [<c014b3f0>] ? audit_syscall_exit+0x2aa/0x2c5 > [<c0109430>] ? do_syscall_trace+0x6b/0x16f > [<c0103a9c>] work_notifysig+0x13/0x1b > ======================= > ---[ end trace 25b49fe59a25afa5 ]--- > possible reason: unannotated irqs-off. > irq event stamp: 58919 > hardirqs last enabled at (58919): [<c0103afd>] syscall_exit_work+0x11/0x26 Joy - I so love entry.S Best I can make of it: syscall_exit_work resume_userspace DISABLE_INTERRUPTS (no TRACE_IRQS_OFF) work_pending work_notifysig do_notify_resume() do_signal() get_signal_to_deliver() try_to_freeze() refrigerator() task_lock() -> check_flags() -> BANG The normal path is: syscall_exit_work resume_userspace DISABLE_INTERRUPTS restore_all TRACE_IRQS_IRET iret No idea why that would not warn.. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
e32e58a9