• David S. Miller's avatar
    [SPARC64]: Make save_stack_trace() more efficient. · 85a79353
    David S. Miller authored
    Doing a 'flushw' every stack trace capture creates so much overhead
    that it makes lockdep next to unusable.
    
    We only care about the frame pointer chain and the function caller
    program counters, so flush those by hand to the stack frame.
    
    This is significantly more efficient than a 'flushw' because:
    
    1) We only save 16 bytes per active register window to the stack.
    
    2) This doesn't push the entire register window context of the current
       call chain out of the cpu, forcing register window fill traps as we
       return back down.
    
    Note that we can't use 'restore' and 'save' instructions to move
    around the register windows because that wouldn't work on Niagara
    processors.  They optimize 'save' into a new register window by
    simply clearing out the registers instead of pulling them in from
    the on-chip register window backing store.
    
    Based upon a report by Tom Callaway.
    Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
    85a79353
stacktrace.h 134 Bytes