-
Linus Torvalds authored
Now that we handle all the special commands using REQ_TYPE_ATA_TASKFILE rather than using the old REQ_TYPE_ATA_CMD model, we need to also emulate the lack of full taskfile data that comes with the old command model (ie when commands are generated with the HDIO_DRIVE_CMD ioctl rather than using the HDIO_DRIVE_TASK[FILE] ioctls). In particular, this means that we should handle command completion the more relaxed way that the old drive_cmd_intr() code did. It allows commands to finish early even if they don't use up all the data that we thought we had for them. This fixes a regression seen by Anders Eriksson where some SMART commands sent by smartd would cause a boot-time system hang on his machine because the IDE command handling code didn't realize that the command had completed. Tested-by: Anders Eriksson <aeriksson@fastmail.fm> Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
6c3c3158