-
Balbir Singh authored
root cgroup. This is a part of the several patches to reduce mem cgroup overhead. I had posted other approaches earlier (including using percpu counters). Those patches will be a natural addition and will be added iteratively on top of these. The patch stops resource counter accounting for the root cgroup. The data for display is derived from the statisitcs we maintain via mem_cgroup_charge_statistics (which is more scalable). What happens today is that, we do double accounting, once using res_counter_charge() and once using memory_cgroup_charge_statistics(). For the root, since we don't implement limits any more, we don't need to track every charge via res_counter_charge() and check for limit being exceeded and reclaim. The main mem->res usage_in_bytes can be derived by summing the cache and rss usage data from memory statistics (MEM_CGROUP_STAT_RSS and MEM_CGROUP_STAT_CACHE). However, for memsw->res usage_in_bytes, we need additional data about swapped out memory. This patch adds a MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SWAPOUT and uses that along with MEM_CGROUP_STAT_RSS and MEM_CGROUP_STAT_CACHE to derive the memsw data. This data is computed recursively when hierarchy is enabled. The tests results I see on a 24 way show that 1. The lock contention disappears from /proc/lock_stats 2. The results of the test are comparable to running with cgroup_disable=memory. Here is a sample of my program runs Without Patch Performance counter stats for '/home/balbir/parallel_pagefault': 7192804.124144 task-clock-msecs # 23.937 CPUs 424691 context-switches # 0.000 M/sec 267 CPU-migrations # 0.000 M/sec 28498113 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec 5826093739340 cycles # 809.989 M/sec 408883496292 instructions # 0.070 IPC 7057079452 cache-references # 0.981 M/sec 3036086243 cache-misses # 0.422 M/sec 300.485365680 seconds time elapsed With cgroup_disable=memory Performance counter stats for '/home/balbir/parallel_pagefault': 7182183.546587 task-clock-msecs # 23.915 CPUs 425458 context-switches # 0.000 M/sec 203 CPU-migrations # 0.000 M/sec 92545093 page-faults # 0.013 M/sec 6034363609986 cycles # 840.185 M/sec 437204346785 instructions # 0.072 IPC 6636073192 cache-references # 0.924 M/sec 2358117732 cache-misses # 0.328 M/sec 300.320905827 seconds time elapsed With this patch applied Performance counter stats for '/home/balbir/parallel_pagefault': 7191619.223977 task-clock-msecs # 23.955 CPUs 422579 context-switches # 0.000 M/sec 88 CPU-migrations # 0.000 M/sec 91946060 page-faults # 0.013 M/sec 5957054385619 cycles # 828.333 M/sec 1058117350365 instructions # 0.178 IPC 9161776218 cache-references # 1.274 M/sec 1920494280 cache-misses # 0.267 M/sec 300.218764862 seconds time elapsed Data from Prarit (kernel compile with make -j64 on a 64 CPU/32G machine) For a single run Without patch real 27m8.988s user 87m24.916s sys 382m6.037s With patch real 4m18.607s user 84m58.943s sys 50m52.682s With config turned off real 4m54.972s user 90m13.456s sys 50m19.711s NOTE: The data looks counterintuitive due to the increased performance with the patch, even over the config being turned off. We probably need more runs, but so far all testing has shown that the patches definitely help. Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com> Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2ae3312b