- 10 Sep, 2005 40 commits
-
-
Marcelo Feitoza Parisi authored
Use of the time_after() macro, defined at linux/jiffies.h, which deals with wrapping correctly and are nicer to read. Signed-off-by:
Marcelo Feitoza Parisi <marcelo@feitoza.com.br> Signed-off-by:
Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
Adrian Bunk authored
We do no longer need a template for OSS drivers. Signed-off-by:
Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Adrian Bunk authored
This patch removes a #define for irq_enter that is superfluous due to a similar one in include/linux/hardirq.h. Signed-off-by:
-
Adrian Bunk authored
This patch contains the most trivial from Rusty's trivial patches: - spelling fixes - remove duplicate includes Signed-off-by:
-
Jesper Juhl authored
This patch does a full cleanup of 'NULL checks before vfree', and a partial cleanup of calls to kfree for all of drivers/ - the kfree bit is partial in that I only did the files that also had vfree calls in them. The patch also gets rid of some redundant (void *) casts of pointers being passed to [vk]free, and a some tiny whitespace corrections also crept in. Signed-off-by:
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Adrian Bunk authored
With gcc -W: drivers/char/hpet.c:102: warning: `inline' is not at beginning of declaration drivers/char/hpet.c:109: warning: `inline' is not at beginning of declaration Signed-off-by:
Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk> Signed-off-by:
-
Pekka J Enberg authored
FSF has moved so update the address as per http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt. Signed-off-by:
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by:
-
Nishanth Aravamudan authored
Replace schedule_timeout() with msleep() to guarantee the task delays as expected. Signed-off-by:
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Nishanth Aravamudan authored
Replace schedule_timeout() with msleep() to guarantee the task delays as expected. Signed-off-by:
-
Victor Fusco authored
Fix the sparse warning "implicit cast to nocast type" Signed-off-by:
Victor Fusco <victor@cetuc.puc-rio.br> Signed-off-by:
-
Victor Fusco authored
Fix the sparse warning "implicit cast to nocast type" Signed-off-by:
-
Tobias Klauser authored
The attached patch fixes the following spelling errors in Documentation/ - double "the" - Several misspellings of function/functionality - infomation - memeory - Recieved - wether and possibly others which I forgot ;-) Trailing whitespaces on the same line as the typo are also deleted. Signed-off-by:Tobias Klauser <tklauser@nuerscht.ch> Signed-off-by:
-
Victor Fusco authored
Fix the sparse warning "implicit cast to nocast type" Signed-off-by:
-
Pekka J Enberg authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Convert the initializers of hw_interrupt_type structures to C99 initializers. Signed-off-by:
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Convert the initializers of hw_interrupt_type structures to C99 initializers. Signed-off-by:
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Convert the initializers of hw_interrupt_type structures to C99 initializers. Signed-off-by:
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Convert the initializers of hw_interrupt_type structures to C99 initializers. Signed-off-by:
-
Randy Dunlap authored
for kernel/acct.c: - fix typos - add kerneldoc for non-static functions Signed-off-by:
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> Signed-off-by:
-
Victor Fusco authored
Fix the sparse warning "implicit cast to nocast type" Signed-off-by:
-
Victor Fusco authored
Fix the sparse warning "implicit cast to nocast type" Signed-off-by:
-
Alexey Dobriyan authored
Signed-off-by:
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Alexey Dobriyan authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Christophe Lucas authored
Signed-off-by:
Christophe Lucas <clucas@rotomalug.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Christophe Lucas authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Christophe Lucas authored
misc_register() can fail. Signed-off-by:
-
Adrian Bunk authored
With Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Give some things static scope. Signed-off-by:
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Paul E. McKenney authored
Update RCU documentation based on discussions and review of RCU-based tree patches. Add an introductory whatisRCU.txt file. Signed-off-by: <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Arthur Othieno authored
Randy cleaned out the bulk of these stale references to the now long gone Documentation/smp.tex back in 2004. I followed this up with a few more sweeps. Somehow, these have managed to sneak back in since. I can't seem to figure out a contact point for M32R (no one listed in MAINTAINERS!), but, these patches are only but trivial. Signed-off-by:
Arthur Othieno <a.othieno@bluewin.ch> Acked-by:
Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
Siddha, Suresh B authored
Don't pull tasks from a group if that would cause the group's total load to drop below its total cpu_power (ie. cause the group to start going idle). Signed-off-by:
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by:
-
Siddha, Suresh B authored
Jack Steiner brought this issue at my OLS talk. Take a scenario where two tasks are pinned to two HT threads in a physical package. Idle packages in the system will keep kicking migration_thread on the busy package with out any success. We will run into similar scenarios in the presence of CMP/NUMA. Signed-off-by:
-
Renaud Lienhart authored
In sys_sched_yield(), we cache current->array in the "array" variable, thus there's no need to dereference "current" again later. Signed-Off-By:
Renaud Lienhart <renaud.lienhart@free.fr> Signed-off-by:
-
Nick Piggin authored
If an idle sibling of an HT queue encounters a busy sibling, then make higher level load balancing of the non-idle variety. Performance of multiprocessor HT systems with low numbers of tasks (generally < number of virtual CPUs) can be significantly worse than the exact same workloads when running in non-HT mode. The reason is largely due to poor scheduling behaviour. This patch improves the situation, making the performance gap far less significant on one problematic test case (tbench). Signed-off-by:
-
Nick Piggin authored
During periodic load balancing, don't hold this runqueue's lock while scanning remote runqueues, which can take a non trivial amount of time especially on very large systems. Holding the runqueue lock will only help to stabilise ->nr_running, however this doesn't do much to help because tasks being woken will simply get held up on the runqueue lock, so ->nr_running would not provide a really accurate picture of runqueue load in that case anyway. What's more, ->nr_running (and possibly the cpu_load averages) of remote runqueues won't be stable anyway, so load balancing is always an inexact operation. Signed-off-by:
-
Nick Piggin authored
Similarly to the earlier change in load_balance, only lock the runqueue in load_balance_newidle if the busiest queue found has a nr_running > 1. This will reduce frequency of expensive remote runqueue lock aquisitions in the schedule() path on some workloads. Signed-off-by:
-
Ingo Molnar authored
William Weston reported unusually high scheduling latencies on his x86 HT box, on the -RT kernel. I managed to reproduce it on my HT box and the latency tracer shows the incident in action: _------=> CPU# / _-----=> irqs-off | / _----=> need-resched || / _---=> hardirq/softirq ||| / _--=> preempt-depth |||| / ||||| delay cmd pid ||||| time | caller \ / ||||| \ | / du-2803 3Dnh2 0us : __trace_start_sched_wakeup (try_to_wake_up) .............................................................. ... we are running on CPU#3, PID 2778 gets woken to CPU#1: ... .............................................................. du-2803 3Dnh2 0us : __trace_start_sched_wakeup <<...>-2778> (73 1) du-2803 3Dnh2 0us : _raw_spin_unlock (try_to_wake_up) ................................................ ... still on CPU#3, we send an IPI to CPU#1: ... ................................................ du-2803 3Dnh1 0us : resched_task (try_to_wake_up) du-2803 3Dnh1 1us : smp_send_reschedule (try_to_wake_up) du-2803 3Dnh1 1us : send_IPI_mask_bitmask (smp_send_reschedule) du-2803 3Dnh1 2us : _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore (try_to_wake_up) ............................................... ... 1 usec later, the IPI arrives on CPU#1: ... ............................................... <idle>-0 1Dnh. 2us : smp_reschedule_interrupt (c0100c5a 0 0) So far so good, this is the normal wakeup/preemption mechanism. But here comes the scheduler anomaly on CPU#1: <idle>-0 1Dnh. 2us : preempt_schedule_irq (need_resched) <idle>-0 1Dnh. 2us : preempt_schedule_irq (need_resched) <idle>-0 1Dnh. 3us : __schedule (preempt_schedule_irq) <idle>-0 1Dnh. 3us : profile_hit (__schedule) <idle>-0 1Dnh1 3us : sched_clock (__schedule) <idle>-0 1Dnh1 4us : _raw_spin_lock_irq (__schedule) <idle>-0 1Dnh1 4us : _raw_spin_lock_irqsave (__schedule) <idle>-0 1Dnh2 5us : _raw_spin_unlock (__schedule) <idle>-0 1Dnh1 5us : preempt_schedule (__schedule) <idle>-0 1Dnh1 6us : _raw_spin_lock (__schedule) <idle>-0 1Dnh2 6us : find_next_bit (__schedule) <idle>-0 1Dnh2 6us : _raw_spin_lock (__schedule) <idle>-0 1Dnh3 7us : find_next_bit (__schedule) <idle>-0 1Dnh3 7us : find_next_bit (__schedule) <idle>-0 1Dnh3 8us : _raw_spin_unlock (__schedule) <idle>-0 1Dnh2 8us : preempt_schedule (__schedule) <idle>-0 1Dnh2 8us : find_next_bit (__schedule) <idle>-0 1Dnh2 9us : trace_stop_sched_switched (__schedule) <idle>-0 1Dnh2 9us : _raw_spin_lock (trace_stop_sched_switched) <idle>-0 1Dnh3 10us : trace_stop_sched_switched <<...>-2778> (73 8c) <idle>-0 1Dnh3 10us : _raw_spin_unlock (trace_stop_sched_switched) <idle>-0 1Dnh1 10us : _raw_spin_unlock (__schedule) <idle>-0 1Dnh. 11us : local_irq_enable_noresched (preempt_schedule_irq) <idle>-0 1Dnh. 11us < (0) we didnt pick up pid 2778! It only gets scheduled much later: <...>-2778 1Dnh2 412us : __switch_to (__schedule) <...>-2778 1Dnh2 413us : __schedule <<idle>-0> (8c 73) <...>-2778 1Dnh2 413us : _raw_spin_unlock (__schedule) <...>-2778 1Dnh1 413us : trace_stop_sched_switched (__schedule) <...>-2778 1Dnh1 414us : _raw_spin_lock (trace_stop_sched_switched) <...>-2778 1Dnh2 414us : trace_stop_sched_switched <<...>-2778> (73 1) <...>-2778 1Dnh2 414us : _raw_spin_unlock (trace_stop_sched_switched) <...>-2778 1Dnh1 415us : trace_stop_sched_switched (__schedule) the reason for this anomaly is the following code in dependent_sleeper(): /* * If a user task with lower static priority than the * running task on the SMT sibling is trying to schedule, * delay it till there is proportionately less timeslice * left of the sibling task to prevent a lower priority * task from using an unfair proportion of the * physical cpu's resources. -ck */ [...] if (((smt_curr->time_slice * (100 - sd->per_cpu_gain) / 100) > task_timeslice(p))) ret = 1; Note that in contrast to the comment above, we dont actually do the check based on static priority, we do the check based on timeslices. But timeslices go up and down, and even highprio tasks can randomly have very low timeslices (just before their next refill) and can thus be judged as 'lowprio' by the above piece of code. This condition is clearly buggy. The correct test is to check for static_prio _and_ to check for the preemption priority. Even on different static priority levels, a higher-prio interactive task should not be delayed due to a higher-static-prio CPU hog. There is a symmetric bug in the 'kick SMT sibling' code of this function as well, which can be solved in a similar way. The patch below (against the current scheduler queue in -mm) fixes both bugs. I have build and boot-tested this on x86 SMT, and nice +20 tasks still get properly throttled - so the dependent-sleeper logic is still in action. btw., these bugs pessimised the SMT scheduler because the 'delay wakeup' property was applied too liberally, so this fix is likely a throughput improvement as well. I separated out a smt_slice() function to make the code easier to read. Signed-off-by: -
Ingo Molnar authored
This patch implements a task state bit (TASK_NONINTERACTIVE), which can be used by blocking points to mark the task's wait as "non-interactive". This does not mean the task will be considered a CPU-hog - the wait will simply not have an effect on the waiting task's priority - positive or negative alike. Right now only pipe_wait() will make use of it, because it's a common source of not-so-interactive waits (kernel compilation jobs, etc.). Signed-off-by:
-
Ingo Molnar authored
whitespace cleanups. Signed-off-by:
-
M.Baris Demiray authored
Add relevant checks into find_idlest_group() and find_idlest_cpu() to make them return only the groups that have allowed CPUs and allowed CPUs respectively. Signed-off-by:
M.Baris Demiray <baris@labristeknoloji.com> Signed-off-by:
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Signed-off-by:
-
Con Kolivas authored
The hyperthread aware nice handling currently puts to sleep any non real time task when a real time task is running on its sibling cpu. This can lead to prolonged starvation by having the non real time task pegged to the cpu with load balancing not pulling that task away. Currently we force lower priority hyperthread tasks to run a percentage of time difference based on timeslice differences which is meaningless when comparing real time tasks to SCHED_NORMAL tasks. We can allow non real time tasks to run with real time tasks on the sibling up to per_cpu_gain% if we use jiffies as a counter. Cleanups and micro-optimisations to the relevant code section should make it more understandable as well. Signed-off-by:
Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> Acked-by:
-
