Commit c9169f87 authored by Adam Litke's avatar Adam Litke Committed by Paul Mackerras

[POWERPC] hugepage BUG fix

On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 08:22 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> kernel BUG in cache_free_debugcheck at mm/slab.c:2748!

Alright, this one is only triggered when slab debugging is enabled.  The
slabs are assumed to be aligned on a HUGEPTE_TABLE_SIZE boundary.  The free
path makes use of this assumption and uses the lowest nibble to pass around
an index into an array of kmem_cache pointers.  With slab debugging turned
on, the slab is still aligned, but the "working" object pointer is not.
This would break the assumption above that a full nibble is available for
the PGF_CACHENUM_MASK.

The following patch reduces PGF_CACHENUM_MASK to cover only the two least
significant bits, which is enough to cover the current number of 4 pgtable
cache types.  Then use this constant to mask out the appropriate part of
the huge pte pointer.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAdam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
parent d55c4a76
...@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static void free_hugepte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, hugepd_t *hpdp) ...@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static void free_hugepte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, hugepd_t *hpdp)
hpdp->pd = 0; hpdp->pd = 0;
tlb->need_flush = 1; tlb->need_flush = 1;
pgtable_free_tlb(tlb, pgtable_free_cache(hugepte, HUGEPTE_CACHE_NUM, pgtable_free_tlb(tlb, pgtable_free_cache(hugepte, HUGEPTE_CACHE_NUM,
HUGEPTE_TABLE_SIZE-1)); PGF_CACHENUM_MASK));
} }
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
......
...@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static inline void pte_free(struct page *ptepage) ...@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static inline void pte_free(struct page *ptepage)
pte_free_kernel(page_address(ptepage)); pte_free_kernel(page_address(ptepage));
} }
#define PGF_CACHENUM_MASK 0xf #define PGF_CACHENUM_MASK 0x3
typedef struct pgtable_free { typedef struct pgtable_free {
unsigned long val; unsigned long val;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment