Commit c41bf8fa authored by Jan Kiszka's avatar Jan Kiszka Committed by Andi Kleen

[PATCH] i386: avoid redundant preempt_disable in __unlazy_fpu

There are two callers of __unlazy_fpu, unlazy_fpu and __switch_to, and
none of them appear to require additional preempt_disable/enable here.
Let's open-code save_init_fpu in __unlazy_fpu to save a few ops.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
parent 02b64dab
...@@ -74,11 +74,12 @@ static inline void __save_init_fpu( struct task_struct *tsk ) ...@@ -74,11 +74,12 @@ static inline void __save_init_fpu( struct task_struct *tsk )
task_thread_info(tsk)->status &= ~TS_USEDFPU; task_thread_info(tsk)->status &= ~TS_USEDFPU;
} }
#define __unlazy_fpu( tsk ) do { \ #define __unlazy_fpu( tsk ) do { \
if (task_thread_info(tsk)->status & TS_USEDFPU) \ if (task_thread_info(tsk)->status & TS_USEDFPU) { \
save_init_fpu( tsk ); \ __save_init_fpu(tsk); \
else \ stts(); \
tsk->fpu_counter = 0; \ } else \
tsk->fpu_counter = 0; \
} while (0) } while (0)
#define __clear_fpu( tsk ) \ #define __clear_fpu( tsk ) \
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment