Commit ac354a89 authored by Mike Habeck's avatar Mike Habeck Committed by Tony Luck

[IA64-SGI] pass segment# on SN_SAL_IOIF_SLOT_{DIS,EN}ABLE calls

Bugfix... the altix SN_SAL_IOIF_SLOT_ENABLE & SN_SAL_IOIF_SLOT_DISABLE
SAL calls need to pass the segment# down
Signed-off-by: default avatarMike Habeck <habeck@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
parent 5f7f5b0c
......@@ -24,13 +24,15 @@ sal_pcibr_slot_enable(struct pcibus_info *soft, int device, void *resp)
{
struct ia64_sal_retval ret_stuff;
u64 busnum;
u64 segment;
ret_stuff.status = 0;
ret_stuff.v0 = 0;
segment = soft->pbi_buscommon.bs_persist_segment;
busnum = soft->pbi_buscommon.bs_persist_busnum;
SAL_CALL_NOLOCK(ret_stuff, (u64) SN_SAL_IOIF_SLOT_ENABLE, (u64) busnum,
(u64) device, (u64) resp, 0, 0, 0, 0);
SAL_CALL_NOLOCK(ret_stuff, (u64) SN_SAL_IOIF_SLOT_ENABLE, segment,
busnum, (u64) device, (u64) resp, 0, 0, 0);
return (int)ret_stuff.v0;
}
......@@ -41,14 +43,16 @@ sal_pcibr_slot_disable(struct pcibus_info *soft, int device, int action,
{
struct ia64_sal_retval ret_stuff;
u64 busnum;
u64 segment;
ret_stuff.status = 0;
ret_stuff.v0 = 0;
segment = soft->pbi_buscommon.bs_persist_segment;
busnum = soft->pbi_buscommon.bs_persist_busnum;
SAL_CALL_NOLOCK(ret_stuff, (u64) SN_SAL_IOIF_SLOT_DISABLE,
(u64) busnum, (u64) device, (u64) action,
(u64) resp, 0, 0, 0);
segment, busnum, (u64) device, (u64) action,
(u64) resp, 0, 0);
return (int)ret_stuff.v0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment